HaLow Wi-Fi has now been tested at 9.9 miles — new Wi-Fi world record is a near 5X increase over previous best

HaLow Wi-Fi Access Point to be accessed from nearly ten miles away.
HaLow Wi-Fi Access Point to be accessed from nearly ten miles away. (Image credit: Morse Micro on YouTube)

Back in January, Morse Micro achieved a world record of WiFi range using the HaLow (802.11ah) standard, by conducting a video call over a distance of 1.8 miles through a high-interference San Francisco beach area and proving it worked— and now, in the rural Joshua Tree National Park, they've broken the world record again, almost five times over, with a distance of 9.9 miles, or 15.9 kilometers. 

The connection speed of the earlier San Francisco beach test ranged from 11 Megabits per second at 500 meters to just a single Megabit per second at then-maximum 1.8 mile range. Meanwhile, the throughput of HaLow in this new testing topped out at 2 Megabits per second at 9.9 miles — likely a best-case scenario considering how little interference there is in a rural area like Joshua Tree National Park compared to a place as densely-populated as a San Francisco beach.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Christopher Harper
Contributing Writer

Christopher Harper has been a successful freelance tech writer specializing in PC hardware and gaming since 2015, and ghostwrote for various B2B clients in High School before that. Outside of work, Christopher is best known to friends and rivals as an active competitive player in various eSports (particularly fighting games and arena shooters) and a purveyor of music ranging from Jimi Hendrix to Killer Mike to the Sonic Adventure 2 soundtrack.

  • JRStern
    And it can keep your coffee warm all day and on your drive home.
    Reply
  • kanewolf
    It is interesting that 900Mhz wireless networking is coming back.
    Reply
  • Integr8d
    You can run little LoRa ESP32 nodes for about $20 and they’ll help to build the LoRa mesh network for everyone. I have 2 running in Los Angeles and they pass packets all day.
    Reply
  • Kamen Rider Blade
    This is what IoT devices should be running on, instead of the existing 2.4 GHz / 5.0 GHz / 6.0 GHz bands.

    Then you can place your IoT devices as far away or as close as you want on your property.

    This would also make for a great "Walkie Talkie" like feature built into modern Smart Phones / Tablets to allow local Direct Video/Audio/Text conferencing / communications over a standardized protocol w/o relying on local Wi-Fi / Cellular networks.

    Just direct communication with each other or your low HaLow Router.
    Reply
  • brandonjclark
    This is definitely cooler than your typical "Pi-Hole Creator Makes Gadget X!" article.

    I LOVE the idea of long-range wifi.
    Reply
  • kanewolf
    brandonjclark said:
    This is definitely cooler than your typical "Pi-Hole Creator Makes Gadget X!" article.

    I LOVE the idea of long-range wifi.
    LOW BANDWIDTH, long range. As low as 150K bps. Suitable for some IOT type devices. You aren't watching much 4K YouTube 1/2 mile from your base station. Streaming spotify? Maybe.
    Reply
  • Wayne Colony
    Admin said:
    Morse Micro returns with yet another promising HaLow demonstration, now achieving 9.9 miles range in a rural national park.

    HaLow Wi-Fi has now been tested at 9.9 miles — new Wi-Fi world record is a near 5X increase over previous best : Read more
    I remember the WiFi world record as being 124.9 miles from the 2005 DEFCON WiFi shootout. It ended the contest because the mountain they connected from was the farthest line of sight point that could ever be used.
    https://www.wired.com/2005/08/hackers-annihilate-wi-fi-record/
    Reply
  • das_stig
    At that range, I can connect to home network from work. Should free up a lot of office/home security systems from wifi.
    Reply
  • Kondamin
    Might be nice in really remote areas where no one is.
    But since it’s so limited in bandwidth doing more than just a bit of sensor readouts is probably all that it would be good for
    Reply
  • pf100
    Kondamin said:
    Might be nice in really remote areas where no one is.
    But since it’s so limited in bandwidth doing more than just a bit of sensor readouts is probably all that it would be good for
    Even 1mbps is usable because I once had to use a 1mbps connection for a few weeks. I had moved into an area 3/4 miles away from a hospital but I had to wait for a cable to be run for internet. I could connect to the hospital's wifi at 1mbps with an external wifi device with a panel antenna. You're not going to be watching netflix with it but you can browse websites.
    Reply