AMD Launches the FX-4350 and FX-6350 Piledriver CPUs

AMD has refreshed its lineup of FX processors with the launch of the FX-4350 and FX-6350, which are both based on the “Piledriver” architecture, feature an AM3+ socket, and support the “latest instructions including AVX and FMA3.”

The new CPUs can essentially be viewed as faster and less energy-efficient versions of their predecessors since both the FX-4350 and FX-6350 feature a 400 MHz increase in base clock and 30 W higher TDP than the FX-4300 and FX-6300, respectively.

A summary of the new processors' specifications and their respective retail prices are tabulated below.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Swipe to scroll horizontally
SKU Cores Clock Turbo Clock L3 cache TDP Price
FX-4300 4 3.8 GHz 4.0 GHz 4 MB 95 Watt $122
FX-4350 4 4.2 GHz 4.3 GHz 8 MB 125 Watt $122
FX-6300 6 3.5 GHz 4.1 GHz 8 MB 95 Watt $132
FX-6350 6 3.9 GHz 4.2 GHz 8 MB 125 Watt $132
Contributor

Tarun Iyer was a contributor for Tom's Hardware who wrote news covering a wide range of technology topics, including processors, graphics cards, cooling systems, and computer peripherals. He also covered tech trends such as the development of adaptive all-in-one PCs.

  • Dark Lord of Tech
    Nice deals.
    Reply
  • vmem
    cmon, less piledriver refresh, more steamroller development!!!
    on a side note, these FX-chips look better and better for the budget builder
    Reply
  • Dark Lord of Tech
    I agree , on a budget , gotta love them!
    Reply
  • bustapr
    thats quite an interesting price. usually tdp is not a big factor in pricing, but this time you getto choose between a lower power/slower cpu and a higher power/faster cpu at the same price. i like having this choice.
    Reply
  • rolli59
    Looks just like overclocked versions on CPU's with unlocked multipliers.
    Reply
  • Estix
    10739982 said:
    Looks just like overclocked versions on CPU's with unlocked multipliers.

    Overclocked, but not necessarily higher-binned, if they have higher TDPs, they may have slightly higher stock voltages, and lower headroom for OC'ing.
    Reply
  • Cazalan
    The 32nm process has matured. They get some higher binned parts.
    The pricing is still odd. Who wouldn't pay $10 more for 50% more cores?
    Reply
  • twelve25
    I will be interested to see the FX-4350 game benchmarks. It's pretty apparent from benchmarks that games don't use more than 4 cores right now so the 4.3/4.3Ghz could make it the fastest AMD gaming chip.
    Reply
  • twelve25
    10740036 said:
    The 32nm process has matured. They get some higher binned parts.
    The pricing is still odd. Who wouldn't pay $10 more for 50% more cores?

    That was always the problem with the 4300/6300 choice, too. The Quad cores should be $110 max for it to be attractive.



    Reply
  • christop
    I like the prices..
    Reply