Report: Atom 280 Netbooks Arrive in Q2/Q3

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
TOPICS
Jane McEntegart
Contributor

Jane McEntegart is a writer, editor, and marketing communications professional with 17 years of experience in the technology industry. She has written about a wide range of technology topics, including smartphones, tablets, and game consoles. Her articles have been published in Tom's Guide, Tom's Hardware, MobileSyrup, and Edge Up.

  • Sony P580 has a 1.3 GHZ Atom processor. I wonder if that is the same N280 processor.
    Reply
  • sammo505
    I wonder if the graphics chip will be better than the 950. I wanna play some CS at work.
    Reply
  • This doesn't make sense. If you're a netbook fan, then you've probably already bought your netbook. You're not going to buy another, you already have one.
    Reply
  • Tekkamanraiden
    Hmm maybe they'll clear out the N270 out more inexpensively.
    Reply
  • bioosonSony P580 has a 1.3 GHZ Atom processor. I wonder if that is the same N280 processor.no. that's probably the Silverthorne Atom, made for Ultra Mobile, and pocket sized Internet devices.

    the 280 is the successor of the mini notebook Atom 230 processor,and is most likely supported by a better chipset.

    I'd love to see benchmarks between Atom 230/280/330 and the via cpu powered Ion platform.
    Reply
  • 87thrteam
    Hey ladies and gents, found some detailed info

    Intel Atom N270 Pine Trail-M (N280)
    CPU Intel Atom N270 Pineview-M
    Chipset 945GSE+ICH7M Tiger Point-M
    CPU + Chipset 3 Chips 2 Chips
    Footprint 2174mm2 773mm2
    PCB Layer 6 Layers 4/6 Layers
    Clock 1.6GHz
    Memory Speed DDR2-533 DDR2-667
    IGP GMA950 GMA950
    IPG Clock 133MHz 200MHz
    Avg Power 2.5W 2.0W
    TDP 8.0W 7.0W
    Cooling Fan Fanless

    Same crappy GMA950 with a bit higher clock.

    Original Website http://www.hkepc.com/2278
    Reply
  • vider
    Laugh at it all you want, but I remember running F.E.A.R. back at the day, on a 945 chipset. It didn't look that good, but it didn't look that bad as well. So a 67 MHz improvement in speed is not that bad. It does support Pixel Shading 2.0 (Am I right??).
    Reply