Skip to main content

Intel: Higher Resolution Displays Coming 2013

According to a presentation caught by Liliputing, Intel has made it abundantly clear that current resolutions lack the necessary pixels-per-inch (PPI) to efficiently complete everyday media tasks. To solve this problem, Intel is supporting plans for “Retina”-like displays in the near future. The company specifically expects 5-inch Smartphones at a resolution of 1280x800, 10-inch Tablet devices at a resolution of 2560x1440, 11-inch and 13-inch Ultrabooks at 2560x1440 and 2800x1800 respectively, and 15-inch Notebooks and 21-inch All-in-one desktops at a resolution of 3840x2160.

During the Intel Developer Forum presentation, Kirk Skaugen, Vice President and General Manager of PC Client Group stated that Ivy Bridge is “Retina display capable”. A “Retina” display is a screen with such densely populated pixels that the human retina cannot discern one pixel from another at a typical viewing distance. One major obstacle when it comes to mainstreaming Retina technology is the need for adequate processing power. Intel overcame this obstacle with its upcoming Ivy Bridge processor line, bringing integrated graphics capable of powering 2560x1600 resolution displays.

It's nice to see Intel making a push in the advancement of screen technology, but it will need consumers to make the final push in the desire to purchase displays with such high resolutions, which will likely cost a pretty penny.

For a more detailed look of the future Intel predicts, check out this road map:

  • doron
    "but it will need consumers to make the final push in the desire to purchase displays with such high resolutions, which will likely cost a pretty penny."

    Simple - "The all new Retina Display Ultrabook!!" (Apple-lawsuit pending).
    Reply
  • RipperjackAU
    4800 x 2700??!! You are going to need some serious graphics horse power to drive that many pixels. CrossFire and SLI will become mandatory in no time!
    Reply
  • seroism
    Waiting for obilgatory Crysis reference.



    Oh wait.....
    Reply
  • icepick314
    I highly doubt those resolution won't reach till well past 2020...

    the battery technology haven't kept up with the display technology and I can't imagine how much more drain it would be for portable devices...

    as for home displays, there aren't enough content creators that uses ultra high resolution recording devices...not to mention the cost...till more and more devices and contents come out, those resolution will be more of rare treat...
    Reply
  • doron
    RipperjackAU4800 x 2700??!! You are going to need some serious graphics horse power to drive that many pixels. CrossFire and SLI will become mandatory in no time!
    I believe that's why they're purportedly focusing on Haswell's graphics component.
    Reply
  • It's about damn time! I just think it's a disgrace to Dell, HP, other vendors, and Microsoft that it's tablets and phones leading the way. The fact that an iPad has a higher screen resolution than a top of the line Dell XPS laptop shows to me how little interest they have in actually innovating.
    Reply
  • rb420
    DroKingThats cool how Intel are pushing for better stuff for us but I still refuse to buy anything Intel outright anyway. So go ahead keep pushing for better tech then Ill buy from your competition not your greedy ass.
    you might find yourself in the middle of a technological "dark age" if you refuse to buy anything but AMD CPUs before long
    Reply
  • omega21xx
    5760x1080 contains 6,220,800 pixels (eyefinity), 4800x2700 contains... 12,960,000...
    Yeah, Crossfire may indeed be necessary if we don't have some large performance leaps in the next generation or two of GPU's.
    Reply
  • belardo
    Amazing... Apple once again, causes the rest of the computer industry to follow.

    Its been sucky that todays notebooks have these horrible 1200x720 rez (or so).
    Reply
  • doron
    DroKingThats cool how Intel are pushing for better stuff for us but I still refuse to buy anything Intel outright anyway. So go ahead keep pushing for better tech then Ill buy from your competition not your greedy ass.
    Can you point a finger at one company who isn't "greedy"?
    Reply