Next Snapdragon CPU: 2.5GHz, 75% Less Power

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
TOPICS
Jane McEntegart
Contributor

Jane McEntegart is a writer, editor, and marketing communications professional with 17 years of experience in the technology industry. She has written about a wide range of technology topics, including smartphones, tablets, and game consoles. Her articles have been published in Tom's Guide, Tom's Hardware, MobileSyrup, and Edge Up.

  • proton9
    do we really need quad core cpus in our mobiles? seriously?
    Reply
  • Yes yes we do.
    Reply
  • mianmian
    They makes you think you need it.
    Reply
  • HansVonOhain
    Wow, that is some great progress in technology. I am hoping that the architecture will keep the same number of pipelines compared to 1ghz counterparts.
    Reply
  • chrisb2e9
    maybe not in a cell phone but in a tablet it can come in handy.
    Reply
  • killakat
    proton9do we really need quad core cpus in our mobiles? seriously?
    GTFO, hata!!! This damn thing could make tablets more viable than they are now. I'm actually excited for this =D

    Killa approves.
    Reply
  • rohitbaran
    Well, the 75% less power sounds good. These days, smartphone battery life is between 1-2 day for average to heavy usage. Low power components are totally welcome.
    Reply
  • No doubt Nintendo will use quadcores in their upcoming Wii(2) console, and support some real HD.
    Am expecting iPhone 6 to support two front facing cameras for 3D video and playback. This processor can see that as a reality.
    Reply
  • internetlad
    v4nquishYou guys remind of the Bill Gates, and I quote "640K ought to be enough for anybody." 1981
    He never said that, why do people keep quoting this?

    And as far as needing this tech in a PHONE. no.

    In a multifunction personal device with included communications then yes.

    Seriously, they should just stop calling them phones, they're not even good for making calls anymore. It's more screen than phone and they're static flat not curved to your face, last time i checked i wasn't an NES character with a perfectly flat area from my mouth to ear.
    Reply
  • adamboy64
    rohitbaranWell, the 75% less power sounds good. These days, smartphone battery life is between 1-2 day for average to heavy usage. Low power components are totally welcome.
    Ah, yes indeed. With this new more efficient chip, I'd like to see a ultra efficient 1Ghz version. I want more battery life!
    Reply