AMD Launches Zen 4 Ryzen 7000 CPUs, Arrives Sept. 27 Starting at $299

YouTube YouTube
Watch On

AMD unveiled its 5nm Ryzen 7000 lineup today, outlining the details of four new models that span from the 16-core $699 Ryzen 9 7950X flagship, which AMD claims is the fastest CPU in the world, to the six-core $299 Ryzen 5 7600X, the lowest bar of entry to the first family of Zen 4 processors.

Ryzen 7000 marks the first 5nm x86 chips for desktop PCs, but AMD’s newest chips don’t come with higher core counts than the previous-gen models. However, frequencies stretch up to 5.7 GHz - an impressive 800 MHz improvement over the prior generation – paired with an up to 13% improvement in IPC from the new Zen 4 microarchitecture. That results in a 29% improvement in single-threaded performance over the prior-gen chips. That higher performance also extends out to threaded workloads, with AMD claiming up to 45% more performance in more demanding applications.

Paul Alcorn
Editor-in-Chief

Paul Alcorn is the Editor-in-Chief for Tom's Hardware US. He also writes news and reviews on CPUs, storage, and enterprise hardware.

  • thisisaname
    The price at the bottom end is disappointing, I may as well wait for the 3d version and the price and speed of DDR5 to improve before taking the leap.


    Good round up thank you.
    Reply
  • shady28
    Like, they didn't really load AMD RAM settings into an Alder Lake did they?

    From endnotes :

    3. RPL-008: Testing as of 15 August, 2022, by AMD Performance Labs using the following hardware: AMD AM5 Reference Motherboard with AMD Ryzen™ 9 7950X with G.Skill DDR5-6000C30 (F5-6000J3038F16GX2-TZ5N) with AMD EXPO™ loaded, AMD AM4 Reference Motherboard with AMD Ryzen™ 9 5950X and DDR4-3600C16, and ROG Maximus Z690 Hero with Core i9-12900K and G.Skill DDR5-6000C30 (F5-6000J3038F16GX2-TZ5N) with AMD EXPO™ loaded. ALL SYSTEMS configured with NXZT Kraken X63, open air test bench, Radeon™ RX 6950XT (driver 22.7.1 Optional), Windows® 11 22000.856, AMD Smart Access Memory/PCIe® Resizable Base Address Register (“ReBAR”) ON, Virtualization-Based Security (VBS) OFF. Results may vary.
    Reply
  • helper800
    shady28 said:
    Like, they didn't really load AMD RAM settings into an Alder Lake did they?

    From endnotes :

    3. RPL-008: Testing as of 15 August, 2022, by AMD Performance Labs using the following hardware: AMD AM5 Reference Motherboard with AMD Ryzen™ 9 7950X with G.Skill DDR5-6000C30 (F5-6000J3038F16GX2-TZ5N) with AMD EXPO™ loaded, AMD AM4 Reference Motherboard with AMD Ryzen™ 9 5950X and DDR4-3600C16, and ROG Maximus Z690 Hero with Core i9-12900K and G.Skill DDR5-6000C30 (F5-6000J3038F16GX2-TZ5N) with AMD EXPO™ loaded. ALL SYSTEMS configured with NXZT Kraken X63, open air test bench, Radeon™ RX 6950XT (driver 22.7.1 Optional), Windows® 11 22000.856, AMD Smart Access Memory/PCIe® Resizable Base Address Register (“ReBAR”) ON, Virtualization-Based Security (VBS) OFF. Results may vary.
    I would assume thats a typo. How or why would a z690 motherboard have an AMD RAM setting to select?
    Reply
  • rluker5
    Maybe, but that is better than I thought they would do. 6000c30, even XMP is way better than Micron. 5-10 ns slower than my 1st pass tuned 6400c30 on a Prime P and 12700k. But still better than most reviews of Alder.
    Also there is the lack of CPU tuning with e-cores, but that is pretty complicated to explain in a presentation's footnotes and wouldn't look good for them so I honestly can't complain.
    Reply
  • rluker5
    shady28 said:
    Like, they didn't really load AMD RAM settings into an Alder Lake did they?

    From endnotes :

    3. RPL-008: Testing as of 15 August, 2022, by AMD Performance Labs using the following hardware: AMD AM5 Reference Motherboard with AMD Ryzen™ 9 7950X with G.Skill DDR5-6000C30 (F5-6000J3038F16GX2-TZ5N) with AMD EXPO™ loaded, AMD AM4 Reference Motherboard with AMD Ryzen™ 9 5950X and DDR4-3600C16, and ROG Maximus Z690 Hero with Core i9-12900K and G.Skill DDR5-6000C30 (F5-6000J3038F16GX2-TZ5N) with AMD EXPO™ loaded. ALL SYSTEMS configured with NXZT Kraken X63, open air test bench, Radeon™ RX 6950XT (driver 22.7.1 Optional), Windows® 11 22000.856, AMD Smart Access Memory/PCIe® Resizable Base Address Register (“ReBAR”) ON, Virtualization-Based Security (VBS) OFF. Results may vary.
    helper800 said:
    I would assume thats a typo. How or why would a z690 motherboard have an AMD RAM setting to select?
    They could type them in manually. If it boots it boots. But probably a typo. They would have used XMP for simplicity and lower, yet legitimate results. XMP isn't bad at 6000c30, not the best but not bad either.
    Reply
  • Jimbojan
    Based on the power efficiency you showed here, Intel Raptor Lake ( Intel7 ) is already slightly better than AMD (TSMC 5nm), and Intel is able to run higher frequency; clearly shows Intel has a better design than AMD's. When Meteor Lake shows up next year, its Intel4 will be 40% better in power efficiency, that is the time Intel has a definitive lead in power efficiency, may be even better than Apple ARM M3 in 2023, check it out this time next year to confirm it yourself.
    Reply
  • gamr
    thisisaname said:
    The price at the bottom end is disappointing, I may as well wait for the 3d version and the price and speed of DDR5 to improve before taking the leap.


    Good round up thank you.
    kingston ddr5 is cheap(ish)
    Reply
  • shady28
    rluker5 said:
    They could type them in manually. If it boots it boots. But probably a typo. They would have used XMP for simplicity and lower, yet legitimate results. XMP isn't bad at 6000c30, not the best but not bad either.

    I expect it's a typo, but it does bring up that they are running fairly 'hot' on both rigs.

    My biggest callout is, they had the 12900K getting 2040 single thread in Geekbench 5 on a rig with DDR5-6000 C30. Well just go to Geekbench 5 browser on the web and type in 12900K.

    You'll find like 10 on the first page that beat 2040 single thread. 2040 is not a score that a 12900K with well tuned DDR5-6000 gets, it should be at least a hundred points higher.

    It's best to remember this is not a review, it is a 'reveal', a vendor presentation of their new product. They will never ever put up anything that does not show them in a good light. Intel does this too.
    Reply
  • JamesJones44
    shady28 said:
    I expect it's a typo, but it does bring up that they are running fairly 'hot' on both rigs.

    My biggest callout is, they had the 12900K getting 2040 single thread in Geekbench 5 on a rig with DDR5-6000 C30. Well just go to Geekbench 5 browser on the web and type in 12900K.

    You'll find like 10 on the first page that beat 2040 single thread. 2040 is not a score that a 12900K with well tuned DDR5-6000 gets, it should be at least a hundred points higher.

    It's best to remember this is not a review, it is a 'reveal', a vendor presentation of their new product. They will never ever put up anything that does not show them in a good light. Intel does this too.

    Definitely are going to have to wait for the reviews to know anything for sure. AMD could be low balling it or cherry picking based on what the showed. Hopefully AMD lifts the blackout date on reviews in the next few days or weeks.
    Reply
  • Why_Me
    $300 + DDR5 :unsure:
    Reply