AMD Demos Third-Gen Ryzen CPUs, Launches 7nm Radeon VII GPU

Today at CES, AMD CEO Lisa Su took the wraps off of the first consumer CPU and GPU to use the company's new 7nm process. During an hour and a half long presentation that included a look at its upcoming 7nm Epyc Rome data center chip, Su launched the new Radeon VII graphics card and showed an early demo of its upcoming third-gen Ryzen "Matisse" processor. 

Due out February 7th for an MSRP of $699 (£550, $980 AU) in the U.S., the Radeon VII becomes team read's new flagship GPU for gaming. According to AMD, the new graphics card performs 25 to 42 percent faster in popular games than the Radeon Vega 64, its current performance leader. 

Paul Alcorn
Editor-in-Chief

Paul Alcorn is the Editor-in-Chief for Tom's Hardware US. He also writes news and reviews on CPUs, storage, and enterprise hardware.

  • cleavet
    I think you mean to say that it's hard to overstate how well AMD is executing... ;-)
    Reply
  • jimmysmitty
    They need to correct Moores Law. It wasn't that the process nodes were getting smaller but that the number of transistors per square inch were doubling. Yes this does tend to correlate with process node shrinks but not always. It has slowed down though due to process node walls being hit and will probably not speed up but slow down more unless they can find an efficient way to stack transistors for CPUs or move beyond transistors and thus Moores law.
    Reply
  • salgado18
    So Vega VII should be comparable to the RTX 2080? ~30% more than Vega 64
    Reply
  • mtracy1991
    Was the 3000 series for desktops talked about? I don't see anything so I am assuming no.
    Reply
  • jimmysmitty
    21660940 said:
    Was the 3000 series for desktops talked about? I don't see anything so I am assuming no.

    Anandtech showed off a CPU shot of an 8 core with the IO Chip and some numbers showing it just under a 9900K in performance but not much was said about if the 8 core is the top end mainstream or if its just the start.
    Reply
  • mtracy1991
    21660981 said:
    21660940 said:
    Was the 3000 series for desktops talked about? I don't see anything so I am assuming no.

    Anandtech showed off a CPU shot of an 8 core with the IO Chip and some numbers showing it just under a 9900K in performance but not much was said about if the 8 core is the top end mainstream or if its just the start.

    I read some article and was stated that we wont see any 3000 series processors until middle of 2019
    Reply
  • salgado18
    Happy about Ryzen, cautious about Vega.

    They finally matched Intel's IPC, using less power, and on a modular design that is easy to escalate. Can Intel have an answer this year? Or will they need a new architecture to get back on top?

    Happy Vega is fast, not so happy it is expensive. Cut half the memory and drop the price, we need strong competition against those RTXes.
    Reply
  • TCA_ChinChin
    Vega 7 is pretty much a disappointment but Ryzen 3000 shows a lot of promise by matching the i9-9900k core to core as an engineering sample.
    Reply
  • shmoochie
    I just don't get why they would price match the 2080. They should be looking to undercut Nvidia, not go head-to-head.
    Reply
  • InvalidError
    21660852 said:
    They need to correct Moores Law. It wasn't that the process nodes were getting smaller but that the number of transistors per square inch were doubling. Yes this does tend to correlate with process node shrinks but not always.
    You can't increase transistor count without shrinks since the larger die you would otherwise end up with end up prohibitively expensive due to defect density and the number of die you can get per wafer. No process shrinks mean slow or no transistor budget increases because it isn't economically viable - can't double transistor budgets if the chip would end up costing more than twice as much due to being able to make less than half as many of those double-size chips per wafer.

    Every major increase in transistor count for a given product type and price point is directly linked to process shrinks.
    Reply