Asus Shows Off Dual Socket 1366 Motherboard
During CeBIT Germany today, the Taiwanese computer giant showed off its newest motherboard. Dubbed the Z8NA-D6, this newest mainboard will allow for two LGA1366 processors to be used in the same system.
Asus also claims that at 12-inches by 9.6-inches, the Z8NA-D6 is the world's first dual socket ATX motherboard, which allows for it to be used in virtually any ATX computer case (note: Intel's Skulltrail is an Extended ATX mobo). The power connector is another point of interest. The 24+8 pin connection allows for both ATX and SSI power supplies to be used, the latter of which is traditionally used in servers.
The motherboard is based on Intel's 5500+ICH10R chipset, and can support all 1366 processors, including the upcoming Xeon 5500s. Supported memory includes up to 48 GB of RDIMM or 24 GB of UDIMM, with ECC support. The one shortcoming of this board is the lack of PCIe 2.0 x16 slots. With only one on the Z8NA-D6, you can forget about any sort of SLI or Crossfire setup. As for other expansion slots, the Z8NA-D6 comes with two PCIe x8 slots, one PIKE slot, and a PCIe x1 slot, which will likely be used for a soundcard. Like any other Asus mobo, expect this one to come with RAID software already included on the board.
The Z8NA-D6 may be the first dual socket 1366 motherboard spotted (no price or release date yet), but we doubt it's the last. 1366 Skulltrail, anybody?
You'd Also Like
-
Biostar Racing X570GT8 Motherboard Review: Affordable M.2 Excess
Tom's Hardware -
Best Motherboards 2019: For Gaming, by Socket and Chipset
Tom's Hardware -
Gigabyte Shows Off Six Aorus X570 Boards for Ryzen 3000 CPUs
Tom's Hardware -
Asus ROG Strix B450-F Gaming Motherboard Review: Premium Looks, Budget Price
Tom's Hardware
The Skull trail and quadFX setups from the past were not very impressive.
What happened to the 8 or 12 you have two cpu's you should have doubble the ram slots only half baked if you ask me
My bet is that they went with six RAM slots due to space constraints. There isn't exactly a lot open real estate on that board. Besides, 24 GB over six slots is more than enough for anything, as evidenced by our VM story yesterday: http://www.tomshardware.com/news/kingston-core-i7-crysis,7194.html
-Devin
makes it nice for 3d animation as those cards (fireGL, and the nvidea equivalent, forget what it's called) don't used sli/crossfire. meaning you can use the other slots for raid controller cards and other workstation type things
factor in the cost of r&d spread out over fewer units sold, and you've got yourself a bigger price tag.
I do suspect overclocking heat would be an issue as it would be difficult to fit two aftermarket heatsinks … Watercooling I guess.
All this sounds rather pricey, but damn it be sweet if ya had the cash!
You need to realize this is a new socket/architecture so quite a bit of money must have been spent on the R&D.
Shadow, please don't assume that anyone posting here has applied any reasoned thought to their posts. I know I don't.
Lol, I guess that sets shadow appart as one of the good guys on this forum. :P
Also after I saw the other boards in the family, I kinda felt that Asus had not put much effort into the design of this board. I mean if they basically just cut down the memory slot and by doing so reduce the overall footprint of the board.
Personally I would rather see they drop that hardware (RAID?) controller that add those extra SATA ports on the bottom left, and instead use that spot for the SATA ports provided by the chipset, and since from the looks of things they have dropped both floppy and IDE connector, they can move the chipset (assuming the chipset is indeed the one that is covered by that huge heatsink) further away, and thus providing more space a second (or even third) PCIe-16 as well as moving the first PCIe-16 further away from that memory slot.
Honestly even if this is somewhat a breakthrough, it's not really a very well designed board in my opinion. Not nearly close to what Supermicro has done with X7DCA-L, grated that's still use the older Core based Xeons but you get the idea.
What are the lower two slots - below the last pcie slot?
Forgot to quote!
Ofc board design isn't brilliant. It's asus. The only thing worse than their homepage is their board design. But at least their boards usually work.
I see the same problem on my system. Supreme Commander FA starts lagging on big maps with enough AI's and mods after about 45 minutes - but my taskmanager only shows approximedly 60% cpu utilization. I tried clocking my 4870 down to 500/500 and it didn't make any significant impact on the behavour, so it's definetly a cpu limitation - but simply so because the software appearently doesn't use both cores properly. I assume it has to do with the detail that most graphics engines can't split up the rendering to run on multiple cores.
Had the same problem with Supreme Commander when played over a lan. 4 Human vs 4 pcs. The problem has to do with the AI, there is a bug in it.
Was running on a 2.4GHZ quad core with 4 GB ram.