Core i9-9900K At 5GHz Purportedly 16.5 Percent Faster Than Stock Ryzen 7 2700X

(Image credit: Lau Kin Lam/YouTube)

Prolific Chinese overclocker Lau Kin Lam claims he has taken Intel's forthcoming Core i9-9900K processor to a staggering 5GHz on all eight cores using watercooling. As with all leaked test results, take these with a grain of salt. However, the corresponding YouTube video lends some credence to the score.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Zhiye Liu
News Editor, RAM Reviewer & SSD Technician

Zhiye Liu is a news editor, memory reviewer, and SSD tester at Tom’s Hardware. Although he loves everything that’s hardware, he has a soft spot for CPUs, GPUs, and RAM.

  • randomstuff7970
    This is going to be an amazing chip. Outstanding for gaming and servicable for those rare apps like video processing.
    Reply
  • kostarelosdimitris
    well...if it's 450$ , like 150 more bucks than 2700x then the price is not worthy it...perhaps if it's around 380 to 400...
    Reply
  • mlee 2500
    21320484 said:
    This is going to be an amazing chip. Outstanding for gaming and servicable for those rare apps like video processing.

    Yeah I been looking forward to its release...been putting off a new build in anticipation, so hopefully it measures up.

    I was going to wait for 10nm, but then someone pointed out that even when it's released the initial couple generations will be spent maturing beyond rough parity, as has been the case of previous shrinks.
    Reply
  • randomstuff7970
    21320553 said:
    21320484 said:
    This is going to be an amazing chip. Outstanding for gaming and servicable for those rare apps like video processing.

    Yeah I been looking forward to its release...been putting off a new build in anticipation, so hopefully it measures up.

    I was going to wait for 10nm, but then someone pointed out that even when it's released the initial couple generations will be spent maturing beyond rough parity, as has been the case of previous shrinks.

    Yeah. Definitely advise against an 8086k build now when this is coming out in a month.
    Reply
  • So:

    Approx 16.5% faster then the R7 2700x
    Costs approx 35-40% more than the R7 2700x

    Threadripper 1920x price was lowered to $399 this week. I wonder how it compares to that for about the same money.
    Reply
  • Azilgath
    "...the Core i9-9900K clocked at 5GHz is basically 13.6 percent faster than a Ryzen 7 2700X at 4.2GHz."

    Isn't 4.2 the boost mode on the Ryzen? What would be the results against intel if it was overclocked?
    Reply
  • racksmith101
    Probably only about 10%, and for twice the price? Wonder how hot it runs? I'm still can't see what all the hype is about. I also wonder how many security flaws will be found in this one.
    Reply
  • Shumok
    It will be top of the hill for about 6 months until AMD releases 7nm Ryzens. For dedicated Intel buyers, there won't be anything significantly better for 2-3 years. Intel is pushing every button they have on this one. Got to wait for something new from the architecture team.
    Reply
  • 21320701 said:
    It will be top of the hill for about 6 months until AMD releases 7nm Ryzens. For dedicated Intel buyers, there won't be anything significantly better for 2-3 years. Intel is pushing every button they have on this one. Got to wait for something new from the architecture team.

    Sorry but that's not even close to being true. Intel will have 10nm CPU's in 2019. (which quarter in 19' is not known ATM)
    Reply
  • Tyler LM
    So the price of the 2700X is 300(ish) dollars, the i9-9900K will be 500 dollars... Why bother?

    I would rather go with the slightly weaker CPU by 16.5% but save 40% cash..
    Reply