A Reintroduction To American Megatrends (AMI)

If you have been in the tech industry for a while, or just looked closely at your motherboard, you have probably heard of American Megatrends, better known as AMI. The company is known around the world for its development of BIOSes, which are used on the vast majority of motherboards, but because of its somewhat behind-the-scenes role in the industry, people tend to not know too much more about the company.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Michael Justin Allen Sexton is a Contributing Writer for Tom's Hardware US. He covers hardware component news, specializing in CPUs and motherboards.
  • g00ey
    Back in the day, the AMI BIOS was something everyone hated. The preferred BIOSes came from Award. The Award BIOSes were easier to configure, and had more overclocking and unlocking features than AMI. I don't know how things stand today, now since UEFI has come along, but I still have that same sentiment towards AMI and those OEM BIOSes feel very awkward even today, especially those "Dell" BIOSes.
    Reply
  • Ghoul
    AMI was disgusting compared to the others
    Reply
  • Cristian_ARG
    Dont forget AMIDuOS. Very good android emulator
    Reply
  • CaedenV
    Neat article! Never was a fan of AMI. As others have stated here, AMI bios was one of the worst available in the custom PC world, but they had a big name in the prebuilt world as they were 'more secure'... or at least locked down properly.

    Would love to see more articles like this on other old companies that we don't think of on a daily basis!
    Reply
  • IInuyasha74
    I've not encountered any problems personally with AMI BIOSes. The older ones I have used were relatively limited, but those were typically from an OEM like Dell or HP and limited by choice of the OEM. It is possible that the issues that you have previously encountered with BIOSes from AMI were because the OEMs chose to use the basic firmware package to save costs, but I cannot say for certain.
    Reply
  • mctylr
    That's an overly positive puff piece that feels largely ripped from AMI's own corporate profile.
    Reply
  • mctylr
    BTW the picture in the section about L2 cache only displays banks of DRAM SIMM modules, not L2 cache. The second photo from Tom's Hardware article, Socket 5: Tuning Old PC Systems (page 7 - Memory upgrade) actually shows L2 cache on the motherboard.
    Reply
  • IInuyasha74
    16904083 said:
    BTW the picture in the section about L2 cache only displays banks of DRAM SIMM modules, not L2 cache. The second photo from Tom's Hardware article, Socket 5: Tuning Old PC Systems (page 7 - Memory upgrade) actually shows L2 cache on the motherboard.

    I am surprised you managed to find the original TH story where I got the picture, but you don't seem to know what SIMM modules are. Although they were used as system RAM at times in the 1980s, they were extensively used as L2 cache on motherboards using SDRAM for system RAM.

    Also, this is not an overly positive puff piece, and doesn't come from the corporate profile. I had an interview with representatives from AMI and did additional research to write this article, and it is merely meant to discuss the various areas of business the company is involved in. I didn't review these products, nor say that we all need to go and use products with AMI firmware.
    Reply
  • gadgety
    Michael Justin Allen Sexton, rather than just regurgitating AMI's presentation it would serve you and your readers well with a bit of analysis and perhaps wider contextual scope.
    Reply
  • IInuyasha74
    16904554 said:
    Michael Justin Allen Sexton, rather than just regurgitating AMI's presentation it would serve you and your readers well with a bit of analysis and perhaps wider contextual scope.

    I believe you may have missed the purpose of this article, but care to elaborate? What type of analysis do you feel would be useful here? A comparison of AMI's firmware to it's competitors? That would be a good article, but that is not the purpose of this one.
    Reply