Intel Tock-Ticks Chipsets Back to 22nm

We've confirmed through multiple sources that Intel is fabbing its new H310C chipset on its 22nm process. That means the chip-making giant has taken a step back to an older process for the H310C chipset as it struggles with its ongoing shortage of 14nm processors. Contrary to recent reports, our sources confirmed Intel manufactures these chips and not TSMC (which has been reported in recent weeks), though that could be subject to change in the future.

H310C (Image credit: mydrivers.com)
Paul Alcorn
Editor-in-Chief

Paul Alcorn is the Editor-in-Chief for Tom's Hardware US. He also writes news and reviews on CPUs, storage, and enterprise hardware.

  • takeshi7
    Is this the first ever instance of redesigning a chip to work on a larger process node?! It's the only example I'm aware of.
    Reply
  • slybootz
    Take that, Moore's Law
    Reply
  • InvalidError
    21334572 said:
    Is this the first ever instance of redesigning a chip to work on a larger process node?! It's the only example I'm aware of.
    I bet this is far more common than you might think, we just don't hear about it as much because most of it is happening on chips nobody other than affected product engineers are tracking. For example, few to no people know or care about what chips are being used in their SmartTVs, SmartFridge, wireless speakers, etc.
    Reply
  • slybootz
    I just now re-read the title of the article. Good one
    Reply
  • wifiburger
    And.... nobody cares .
    Reply
  • pct8750
    Z370, H310C?200 Series Chipset.
    Please compare H310C and Z370 pics with 200 Series Chipset pics.
    Those all look the same to me!

    USB 3.0 xHCI Host Controller on 200 Series Chipset, Z370, and probably H310C
    DeviceID:A2AF
    There are USB drivers for Windows 7.

    USB 3.0 xHCI Host Controller on H370, B360, H310
    DeviceID:A36D
    There are no USB drivers for Windows 7.

    Intel has not released Windows 7 USB 3.0 drivers for DeviceID:A36D.
    Reply
  • Paskek
    Well the 22nm works fine it just takes about 30% more power draw compare to the 14nm chipsets.
    Since Intel currently lives and die by their 14nm++ it's logical to sacrifice a little on the efficiency for Intel's customers that got the older gen process boards in order for Intel to pump out more of their higher margin products like processors so Intel could make more money.
    Reply
  • tuetano
    H310C, which measures 10 x 7mm. Ok, here you are: 10 & 7 nm. Success.
    Reply
  • IntelUser2000
    Intel also needs to ship 200 million 14nm LTE modems to Apple. That is likely a big reason for supply constraints.
    Reply
  • stdragon
    21335554 said:
    Well the 22nm works fine it just takes about 30% more power draw compare to the 14nm chipsets.
    Since Intel currently lives and die by their 14nm++ it's logical to sacrifice a little on the efficiency for Intel's customers that got the older gen process boards in order for Intel to pump out more of their higher margin products like processors so Intel could make more money.

    So long as it's used for desktop and not laptops, I guess it will have to suffice for now.
    Reply