Intel Announces Agilex 7 M-Series FPGAs with R-Tile, PCIe 5.0 and CXL 2.0 Support

Agilex 7 Materials
(Image credit: Intel Corporation)

Intel today announced its Agilex 7 M-Series family of Field-Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) products, doubling down on its revitalized 10nm SuperFin fabrication node. Citing rising market demand for FPGA solutions as co-processors for Networking, Data Center, High Performance Computing (HPC)Cloud computing and other applications, Intel promises increased flexibility (mainly due to FPGA's inherently programmable nature) and higher scaling capabilities than ever before. Intel's Agilex 7 FPGAs introduce a new chiplet as part of their heterogeneous multi-die architecture, the R-Tile, which is responsible for delivering the latest connectivity technologies - namely PCIe 5.0 and CXL support - in hardware-accelerated, hard-coded IP blocks.

Agilex 7 Materials

Intel's Agilex 7 FPGAs are fabricated on the company's 10 nm SuperFin technology. A number of different IP blocks are laid out atop an interposer and connected through Intel's EMIB. The new R-Tile and its PCIe 5.0 and CXL 2.0 capabilities are entirely self-contained in a single chiplet. (Image credit: Intel Corporation)
Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Francisco Pires
Freelance News Writer

Francisco Pires is a freelance news writer for Tom's Hardware with a soft side for quantum computing.

  • JayNor
    Nice article. Can the CXL 2.0 implementation act as a master?
    Reply
  • TerryLaze

    Being more specialized hardware, FPGAs can be used to accelerate workloads that aren't CPU-dependent, thus freeing up valuable CPU resources for their specific tasks
    If something isn't cpu-dependent then how much CPU resources is it really going to free up?!
    FPGAs are there to run stuff that is very CPU-dependent would you try and run them on a normal CPU, you make your own accelerators on the FPGA for those things.

    That should bring about significant improvements in power efficiency and data throughput, which are important elements to lower Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) for high-performance installations. But with these choices, there are always trade-offs: Intel is adding yet another fixed-function hardware block onto a product whose desirability lies in it being programmable. Programmable die area is the FPGA buyer's mantra, after all.
    Yes, customers want the FPGA for the FPGA, they don't want to have to use up parts of the precious FPGA to implement PCI and CXL and whatever other standard thing that they only need to get data to the FPGA part fast enough.
    More fixed function that end users actually need means more FPGA remains free for the actual work end users want to do on it.

    But the only real question is why in the world didn't they call it the R-Type tile...
    Reply