Intel Posts Largest Loss in Its History as Sales Plunge 36%

Intel
(Image credit: Intel)

While Intel's sales beat its own expectations in the first quarter, the company on Thursday posted the largest loss in its history as its margins plunged to a new low over the last several years. The company expects its short-term results to continue suffering from weak demand for PCs and servers but remains optimistic about its prospects in the coming years once its next-generation products hit the market.

Biggest Loss Amid Low Margins

TOPICS
Anton Shilov
Contributing Writer

Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.

  • InvalidError
    Sales do tend to drop when you axe whole business units and pricing for your remaining units is kind of tone-deaf to the actual market.
    Reply
  • Kamen Rider Blade
    It's like watching the Titanic Slowly Sink over the course of years.
    Reply
  • Elusive Ruse
    I hope they manage to get things right ( in a customer friendly manner), Intel is a legendary company and I want them to be out there innovating and competing.
    Reply
  • TerryLaze
    Kamen Rider Blade said:
    It's like watching the Titanic Slowly Sink over the course of years.
    They had a super high for the last 6 years and are now basically twice the company they were then.
    From last quarter of 2016 to today:
    property went from 36 to 85
    total assets from 113 to 185
    now the total bebt also increased by a lot but in general it's like if the titanic blew up like a balloon and lifted to the sky, then what intel goes through would be just like it.
    InvalidError said:
    Sales do tend to drop when you axe whole business units and pricing for your remaining units is kind of tone-deaf to the actual market.
    They increased a lot in size which makes it necessary for them to go through their inventory and sort things out that won't make them any money in the future.

    You don't negotiate with terrorists and you don't drop prices when the market goes down.
    Intel knows the secret that many people seem to ignore, we live in a world where technology is essential, there is no way out of buying your next CPU, it might take a while longer than normal but nobody can avoid it.
    Reply
  • I believe you’re referring to the elasticity. Electronics are not as elastic as let’s say gasoline.


    It’s also interesting to note the word terrorist that you use, so the market is a terrorist?

    I see them as a failing company going forward if they don’t change their ways. They only did well because of Covid in the past few years.
    Reply
  • Elusive Ruse
    Mandark said:
    It’s also interesting to note the word terrorist that you use, so the market is a terrorist?
    Fascinating isn't it? It goes to show how Intel trains their employees and indoctrinates their outlook towards the market.
    Reply
  • peachpuff
    Tiny violin.gif
    Reply
  • baboma
    It's amusing to see people wishing Intel would somehow disappear. People can't see past their own noses. What do you think would happen to x86 CPU pricing if AMD was the sole manufacturer?

    Do fanboys ever grow up?
    Reply
  • InvalidError
    TerryLaze said:
    You don't negotiate with terrorists and you don't drop prices when the market goes down.
    Intel knows the secret that many people seem to ignore, we live in a world where technology is essential, there is no way out of buying your next CPU, it might take a while longer than normal but nobody can avoid it.
    When you are a company with some over-inflated profit margins, you do need to debloat your margins during a market slowdown by some amount to keep sales going of your potential customers will look for exit doors never look back.

    As for the "secret of buying your next CPU", ~15 years of PC sales going down by a steady 5-8%/year until COVID caused a sugar rush that is still in mid-crash right now disagree. A steadily growing number of people are moving to non-PC and stretching whatever PCs they may have some number of additional years longer.

    baboma said:
    It's amusing to see people wishing Intel would somehow disappear. People can't see past their own noses. What do you think would happen to x86 CPU pricing if AMD was the sole manufacturer?
    x86 is a kludgy instruction set that should have died 15+ years ago. If Intel disappeared, it could finally give the industry a push to settle on a new open ISA like RISC-V to avoid license hostage taking like you do with ARM.

    Intel chips are a critical part of US infrastructure and the US government's requirements on backup suppliers of critical infrastructure is how AMD got its x86 license. The US government won't allow Intel to fall.
    Reply
  • Math Geek
    "The company lost $2.8 billion during the quarter as its gross margin declined to 38.4%. Despite posting the largest loss in its history, Intel paid $1.5 billion in dividends."

    so long as the investors got money, the rest does not matter. they can just fire another 10,000 people to cover that small payout to the rich.

    move along citizen, nothing to see here......
    Reply