At Computex, Intel Demos A 28-Core Processor Clocked At 5GHz (Updated)

23

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Paul Alcorn
Editor-in-Chief

Paul Alcorn is the Editor-in-Chief for Tom's Hardware US. He also writes news and reviews on CPUs, storage, and enterprise hardware.

  • justin.m.beauvais
    Did they make tea with the water they boiled cooling the thing?

    "Thanks for watching our demo! Complimentary tea?"

    That said, it is an impressive demo. Kudos to Intel for finally ramping it up and showing us some real performance gains in their CPUs.
    Reply
  • Aspiring techie
    I bet this thing will cost an arm, a leg, and a kidney.
    But seriously, that is sweet. Finally, Intel is getting off their lazy tails and giving some meaningful improvements, at least in HEDT.
    Reply
  • derekullo
    If we extrapolate the TDP from the performance on Cinebench with the Core i9-7960X having a TDP of 400 watts ...

    7344 / 4136 = 1.77 x 400 watts = 710 estimated TDP.

    This is in the range of portable space heaters ...

    800 Watt Soleil Infrared Dish Electric Space Heater
    https://www.walmart.com/ip/Soleil-Infrared-Dish-Electric-Space-Heater-Black-DF1015/119424847
    Reply
  • delaro
    And the price tag is what? $5000+?
    Reply
  • redgarl
    Finally something that Intel make and made me say wow. I hope they used solder...
    Reply
  • acasel03
    Wow
    Reply
  • ammaross
    You know for a fact this 28 core CPU isn't 5.0Ghz all-core. Their 18-core can't even do that. Their server-grade 28-core CPUs don't even get near that. This CPU is 2.7Ghz base-clock, so maybe will be 4.4+Ghz single-core turbo at stock. They likely OCed it under LN2 to give a "best case" shocker score. Still impressed none-the-less, but I'll wait patiently to see where real life scenarios rank this costly beast (just look at 28-core Xeons to see where the price will fall ).
    Reply
  • Ilya__
    Intel flexing its manufacturing muscle
    Reply
  • InvalidError
    21029908 said:
    You know for a fact this 28 core CPU isn't 5.0Ghz all-core. Their 18-core can't even do that.
    Intel has had another year to tune 14nm and the architecture. Part of Skylake-(E)X somewhat low clock frequencies is also likely due to Intel rushing the launches to counter Ryzen, ThreadRipper and EPYC, so the chips may have not performed quite up to par with Intel's original plans.

    I agree this is unlikely to be stock. However, I wouldn't be surprised if stock clocks turned up much higher than Skylake-(E)X.
    Reply
  • Paul Alcorn
    21030030 said:
    21029908 said:
    You know for a fact this 28 core CPU isn't 5.0Ghz all-core. Their 18-core can't even do that.
    Intel has had another year to tune 14nm and the architecture. Part of Skylake-(E)X somewhat low clock frequencies is also likely due to Intel rushing the launches to counter Ryzen, ThreadRipper and EPYC, so the chips may have not performed quite up to par with Intel's original plans.

    I agree this is unlikely to be stock. However, I wouldn't be surprised if stock clocks turned up much higher than Skylake-(E)X.
    Check out the image and the updated text I just added. Most definitely NOT at stock. tsk tsk.

    Reply