6 Cores. 12 Threads. Say Hello to Intel's Gulftown!
The new Core i7-980X Extreme Edition processor costs $167 per core or $83 per thread.
Today at the Game Developers Conference, Intel previewed platforms featuring the latest Core i7-980X Extreme Edition processor, codenamed "Gulftown," the first 32nm, six-core processor with 12 computing threads.
We've put the shiny new Extreme processor through its paces inside our labs and we're mighty impressed that the Core i7-980X met our high expectations. Of course, at a cost of $1,000 per CPU, anything less than the fastest would have been a disappointment.
Check out a rundown of the latest and greatest from Intel with a walkthrough by Chris Angelini:
For the full story, check out our full review here.
Stay tuned for more Gulftown coverage as we're currently working on a Gulftown vs. Bloomfield showdown.
Stay on the Cutting Edge
Join the experts who read Tom's Hardware for the inside track on enthusiast PC tech news — and have for over 25 years. We'll send breaking news and in-depth reviews of CPUs, GPUs, AI, maker hardware and more straight to your inbox.
-
brett1042002 Great CPU for benchmarking or heavy workstation applications. Waste of money for a gaming rig... at this point in time anyways.Reply -
lightsaber Only $167 per core....let me see this amounts to about $1002 for a processor. Looks good, wish the price was more affordable.Reply -
Abrahm Looks awesome. I'll be waiting until a more reasonably priced non-Extreme version of this comes out, but when it does I will definitely be building a new rig to replace my current Q6600 setup.Reply -
sohei anyway you can build a dual socket i7 920 8 cores/12 threads platform which is better than 980 and you remain with almost half of the money in your pocket...and about power consumption :Reply
2 i7 920 must work 4 years non-stop in full load to consume the difference in money of i7 980
in 4 years i7 980 will be just a piece of metal with no value
-
matt_b 6, 8, 12, 48 cores/threads - it doesn't matter. Programming is lagging far far behind to even utilize these things. We are stuck in an era where most programs are still single core oriented and dual is the new/current trend for games! Unless I am a number cruncher, statistician, programmer, etc, what good does it do to have these when a majority of people will spend their time watching all these extra cores.......idle? I wish more than a core count race, that someone would find the way to break the barrier and be able to up the speed past the 3-3.5 Ghz barrier we have been stuck at for years now. Thumbs up for the cool factor just to have one though, not much else.Reply -
Dirtman73 Heck, I should be able to buy this when the price becomes reasonable, say in about 3-4 years. Of course, by then it'll be outdated technology.Reply
I'm just kidding. It's Intel, so I plan on never buying it, regardless of the price. -
killerclick Matt_B6, 8, 12, 48 cores/threads - it doesn't matter. Programming is lagging far far behind to even utilize these things.Reply
Wrong! 3D rendering, graphics and video editing applications are heavily threaded and until they get moved to the GPU, a multicore CPU is the best tool for the job. This CPU might be too expensive for the performance gains it offers but that's normal for top-of-the-line Intel Extreme Edition. -
mlopinto2k1 compfreak93doesnt AMD already have this?I believe AMD has a 6 core processor but it does not have hyperthreading.Reply -
shin0bi272 compfreak93doesnt AMD already have this?Intel already has 6 core single die cpus too they are just in the server market. AMD's 6core opteron came out july 1st 09 (on paper at least).Reply
Most Popular
By Mark Tyson
By Aaron Klotz
By Mark Tyson