Graphics Wars: The Big Summer Battle

Analyst Opinion - Part of what makes this year somewhat different in graphics is that Intel has indicated that is now serious about graphics. Intel has been talking a lot about its upcoming graphics technology called Larrabee that it promises will surpass the best that both AMD/ATI and Nvidia will have on the market in two years. Having been down this path before, describing my feelings as a little skeptical would be an understatement. But Intel is a very capable company and it is executing very well at the moment. However, the first reviews of Intel’s new integrated part are available and, unfortunately, reality isn’t in line with expectations.

Looking at Intel’s competition, Nvidia is off doing something different, focusing on a cure for Cancer, Cystic fibrosis, and Parkinson’s disease; it’s aggressively moving its graphics capability into areas that could prolong life. It is hard to argue that isn’t a good thing.

The first independent review of Intel’s integrated graphics is out and it isn’t promising. Effectively, it indicates that the initial product is below expectations and less capable than similar products from both Nvidia and ATI.

This could be largely due to the fact that it is a brand new part and that the software and drivers aren’t optimized yet. This is not uncommon for a new part. Also, since this is a mobile platform product and Intel generally favors battery life over performance in mobile graphics, this may also be the cause for Intel’s mobile graphics performance falling short. However, Intel promised impressive graphics and, at least initially, that isn’t what the first review is showcasing.

I’m a big fan of gaming and all that, probably way too much for my own good, but I’m even a bigger fan of living and this effort speaks to that. Nvidia has their big analyst event in a few weeks and a bunch of us will likely be reporting from this wonderful event from the floor. I’ll let you know then what wonders they showcase that week.

Since it isn’t even September yet, the battles will only get bloodier. But for a technology that has its heart in gaming, is that really a bad thing?

TOPICS
  • timaahhh
    Ok... Its kinda like your saying the same thing over and over though. Alright, its sorta like your just rephrasing the article again and again. :p
    Reply
  • Luscious
    If this guy is actually getting paid to write 700-word articles like this, then I want his job! Seriously.
    Reply
  • fulle
    You got a little carried away with the links. We don't need 1/3 of the article to be in blue.

    Also, did this article say anything we didn't already know? Way to point out the obvious. Of course Intel integrated graphics still suck. Your links for the Nvidia topic to playREACTION are broken btw... The Enthusiast article was trash, giving no numbers, and just basically saying "Yay the 4870 X2 does AA well!". Given the performance of the 4870, all I have to say is "Duh." Worthless.

    I'm starting to get really frustrated with Toms at this point. You guys are turning me into a "hater."
    Reply
  • Darkstar
    I'm a fan of folding@home but is there any way to claim my kilowatt hours as donations on my taxes? There damn well should be.

    so... toms... not much going on in the world of technology today huh? cause this is full of nothin
    Reply
  • jkflipflop98
    Wow, you seriously need to retract this garbage off the front of your site before more people see this unprofessional hackjob.
    Reply
  • JonnyDough
    You got a little carried away with the links. We don't need 1/3 of the article to be in blue.

    Agreed. You would think someone would proof-read the articles and check it after they FTP it, but before they link to it. Even when I was in HS using HTML and Frontpage '98 to make websites I knew to check it before posting. Nothing is worse than having a company see your unfinished work online. Finish and perfect the page, THEN link to it.
    Reply
  • shovelman
    So you talk about Larrabee and then post a link to a review of an X4500HD motherboard stating that "indicates that the initial product is below expectations and less capable than similar products from both Nvidia and ATI."

    How about you find a review of the product you're actually talking about.

    Oh wait there aren't any, because there's no parts on the market yet. Moron.



    Whomever wrote this is a tard.
    Reply
  • am i right that you seem to mislead people that the upcoming integrated graphics from intel is larabee?
    Reply
  • randomizer
    Somebody please edit this article so that the URL at least works, even if you do leave half the article as a link.
    Reply
  • Darkstar
    oh, cool. Glad you guys read your viewer's comments :) thanks for fixing it up a bit.
    Reply