Due at CES 2023, Raptor Lake Non-K CPUs Reportedly Up to 64 Percent Faster Than Alder Lake Counterparts

Intel Raptor Lake
(Image credit: Intel)

The word on the street is that Intel will launch its 13th Generation Raptor Lake non-K processors at CES 2023. Hardware leaker chi11eddog has shared some performance numbers for the upcoming chips. The tipster claims that a motherboard vendor conducted the tests for analysis; nonetheless, we recommend you cautiously approach the information.

Intel’s Raptor Lake K-series, such as the Core i9-13900K or Core i7-13700K, are among the best CPUs on the market. However, not everyone needs a large amount of firepower, which is where the non-K series offerings come into play. They retain the essence of their K-series counterparts, which are the core counts. However, the chips feature slightly slower clock speeds to conform to the 65W TDP.

The leak gives us a sneak peek at the performance of the Core i9-13900, Core i7-13700, Core i5-13600, Core i5-13500, and Core i5-13400. According to chi11eddog, the anonymous motherboard manufacturer tested the processors on the same motherboard with the same memory, so the results are directly comparable between the two generations of Intel chips. However, the leaker didn’t specify whether the vendor was using DDR4 or DDR5 memory. The vendor only used on benchmark (Cinebench R23) to evaluate the chips so the results only illustrate the processors’ performance in that particular software. 

Swipe to scroll horizontally
Intel 13th Gen Raptor Lake Non-K Single-Core CB23 Benchmarks
Processor Raptor Lake Alder Lake Performance Difference
Core i9-13900 / Core i9-12900 2,191 1,986 10%
Core i7-13700 / Core i7-12700 2,027 1,901 6%
Core i5-13600 / Core i5-12600 1,948 1,869 4%
Core i5-13500 / Core i5-12500 1,866 1,808 3%
Core i5-13400 / Core i5-12400 1,798 1,698 6%
Zhiye Liu
News Editor, RAM Reviewer & SSD Technician

Zhiye Liu is a news editor, memory reviewer, and SSD tester at Tom’s Hardware. Although he loves everything that’s hardware, he has a soft spot for CPUs, GPUs, and RAM.

  • Roland Of Gilead
    Okay, so I'm looking at these charts and thinking it's all just a bit MEH! Single core increases kinda like the old 5% mark, and then an increase in multicore which mostly comes about from extra cores. Am I missing something?
    Reply
  • TerryLaze
    Roland Of Gilead said:
    Am I missing something?
    The fact that it's amazing that we still get any improvement in core performance at all...
    But yeah, CPUs don't get faster anymore, they get more throughput.
    Reply
  • PC Hardware Nerd
    It would be interesting to test if the extra cache on the new chips helps multithreaded performance of the P cores without the E cores.
    Reply
  • Gu3sts
    TDP I thought was for cooling. These chips draw more than 65 watts at socket?
    Reply
  • bit_user
    Roland Of Gilead said:
    Okay, so I'm looking at these charts and thinking it's all just a bit MEH! Single core increases kinda like the old 5% mark, and then an increase in multicore which mostly comes about from extra cores. Am I missing something?
    The point of the article was multithreaded performance, not single-threaded.
    Raptor Lake cores have the same microarchitecture as Alder Lake, and are made on the same process node. So, the fact that the performance delta is even that big is fairly impressive! Likely due to larger caches, but there are numerous other minor tweaks.Also, regarding the multithreaded benchmarks, I have to wonder if the DDR5 is running at a higher speed (they said it was the same RAM, but Raptor Lake could potentially run it at a higher speed).
    Reply