Alleged Legion GeForce RTX 4090 Pictured as More RTX 40-Series Specs Emerge (Updated)

Nvidia
Alleged Legion RTX 4090 Images via nga.178.com (Image credit: @wxnod/Twitter)

Update 09/14/2022 1:20 pm PT

Later in the day, wxnod published images of Lenovo Legion GeForce RTX 4090's cooling system. Indeed, the cooler is as sophisticated as it looks. It features two massive heatsinks with dozens of fins made of anodized aluminum that dissipate heat from 13 heat pipes. To put the number into context, GeForce RTX 3090/3090 Ti graphics boards featured 8 – 10 heat pipes, depending on the model. That said, we can speculate that the upcoming GeForce RTX 4090 indeed has higher power consumption and heat dissipation than the existing Nvidia flagship.

Anton Shilov
Contributing Writer

Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.

  • Exploding PSU
    Now that's one really chunky card
    Reply
  • hannibal
    It has to be chunky with that power usage!
    Reply
  • cknobman
    Hard to believe people are getting excited for such a large, expensive, and power hungry card.
    I just have to LOL at a single gfx card sucking up 600+watts of power and then paying upwards of $2k for the privilege to use it.
    Reply
  • g-unit1111
    It's truly insane how large and power hungry GPUs are getting! At this rate by the time they get to the 10XXX series, they'll be as big as a house and consume as much power as Clark Griswold's house in Christmas Vacation.
    Reply
  • g-unit1111
    cknobman said:
    Hard to believe people are getting excited for such a large, expensive, and power hungry card.
    I just have to LOL at a single gfx card sucking up 600+watts of power and then paying upwards of $2k for the privilege to use it.

    Not to mention when the thing inevitably snaps and breaks, because it lacks proper structural support (and I've heard of this happening with the 3XXX series), you're gonna have a bad time.
    Reply
  • LolaGT
    That old saying, a fool and his money......

    Hey, freedom and all that.

    The only reason to buy these is to show your buddies that you have more money than brains.
    Reply
  • Phaaze88
    That's practically a 5 - 6 slot card(need some space for breathing room).
    M-ITX builders are going to get shafted further with their options...


    Hold up - I bloody said it in the following thread, and some people didn't believe me:
    https://forums.tomshardware.com/threads/rtx-4090-allegedly-30-faster-in-timespy-extreme-vs-ln2-rtx-3090-ti.3770645/
    Reply
  • spongiemaster
    g-unit1111 said:
    It's truly insane how large and power hungry GPUs are getting! At this rate by the time they get to the 10XXX series, they'll be as big as a house and consume as much power as Clark Griswold's house in Christmas Vacation.
    No it isn't. This card is only a triple slot. I had a triple slot configuration back in the 90's when running Voodoo2 SLI plus a 2d graphics card. Quad slot SLI was pretty common for years. I ran a few of them myself. If you went triple or quad SLI you were looking at 6 or 8 slots and 1000W. Getting the level of performance we're going to get from a 4090 in a triple slot 400-500W configuration is light years better than we had in the past.
    Reply
  • spongiemaster
    Phaaze88 said:
    That's practically a 5 - 6 slot card(need some space for breathing room).
    M-ITX builders are going to get shafted further with their options...
    It's triple slot. What are you going to put under it to block air flow? There are no multi GPU configurations any more. It looks like the 4090 doesn't have the NVLink connector at all. A sound card or LAN card is not going to block the air flow to a card that large.

    If you're trying to put a halo card in a SFF, it's been years since that's been practical with an air cooler. Water cooling is basically a requirement.
    Reply
  • cirdecus
    I don't understand why they would drop the memory bandwidth down to 256 from 384 on the 4080 and 4070 models? They're showing only the 4090 with 384. The 3080's had 384. I'm also having a hard time believing their going to have that big of a core count between the 4080 and 4090. There was barely a 10% difference in the 30 series.
    Reply