Samsung Showcases 10nm Wafer At Open House

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
TOPICS
  • chicofehr
    I'm sure it's just low power wafers. It's much harder to get high power wafers which is why samsung seems to be ahead of Intel. I'm sure Intel already had 10nm low power already but it it's not useful to them for their parts.
    Reply
  • Amdlova
    for us 10nm its like a dream maybe 256gb SSD for 100us
    but for intel new shine processors 350us for a silicon chip! no way!
    Reply
  • BFU2Miners
    This after TSMC announced that they are working with 10nm.
    Reply
  • jasonkaler
    Intel's tri-gate tech beats finfet tech so there!
    The best news is job creation - that's what we really need, not smaller finfets!
    Reply
  • therealduckofdeath
    This after TSMC announced that they are working with 10nm.
    The minor difference here is, Samsung showing an actual production sample.
    Reply
  • whassup
    This after TSMC announced that they are working with 10nm.

    I can see you sentiments with TSMC....
    Reply
  • dextermat
    Samsung is hitting the limits!
    Reply
  • aviconus
    I love how all the idiots are comparing Samsung's mobile chips to Intel's PC chips. It's like comparing vodka to water. I'm curious if they used Si or SiGe for this wafer, and what the yield % is.
    Reply
  • Coolio Tools
    It is indeed comical reading all the arrogant Intelismell (...er is that StinkEmUp) fans blowing their snot nosed stacks over Samsung being the first legitimate Intel Killer on the rise. Fact: Samsung is 2nd only to Intel right now in Revenue from processor fabrication alone. They already hold the crown as the #1 Memory Maker on the Planet!

    Do realize this all you brain dead Un-Intel...ligent Intel Super Fans. Samsung as a whole is magnitudes bigger than all of Intel. They spend far more on both R&D and CAPEX now than both TSMC and Intel combined in their whole entire semiconductor business end to end. The first ARM chip tested at 10nm was run by Samsung in late 2013...... look it up? Now they are not only testing whole SoC processors fabricated at 10nm they are at the beginning stages of full ramp up, in order to begin production by next year ahead of Intel not even close to producing a comparable SoC Low Power All in One Processor to compare it to.

    Fact; Exynos 7420 and better..... are now slated to be the ARM SoC processor of Choice to go into several HPC Cluster Super Computers. Which on it's own CPU cores only, is turning in benchmarking scores comparable to this generation of i5 processor chips. Add in the fact that these are HMP core processors with HSA heterogeneous Computing API's to turn all the on die GPU's into CPU's and no doubt they'd come close to beating i7's alone. If this is what you fools are relying on.... in thinking that x86 will be first to top Exaflop barrier.... you're all DEAD WRONG!

    The power required to run all the Insmell StingEmUp chips needed would require a dedicated Power Plant and the really intelligent people in the industry already see ARM beating out x86 chips in reaching truly sustainable, energy efficient Exaflop computation at far lower cost sooner!!! ;-P ......you can search EU's Mont Blanc HPC Super Computer Project to find out just how much more energy efficient, equivalent Flops Production of ARM HMP HSA SoC architecture really is! :D

    Let's see how well ARM Big/Little HMP HSA SoC Processors fabricated at Samsung's 10nm FinFet process do against anything Intel has by next year in flops production per watt!!!.... And by 2017 Samsung will indeed move ahead of both TSMC on Volume and Intel on Revenue to take #1 in those two categories away from both of them!!! ......and above all it's Samsung with fatter pockets than both of them put together and willing to spend it too! ......and don't forget, Samsung pays their own C&T Division to build not only that state of the art building in Silicon Valley above, but to build every one of their own state of the Art foundries and already have superior Litho technology to Intel's too. Plus.... planning on spending more on one new foundry than what neither Intel or TSMC could afford right now!
    Reply