52-core Xeon 8470 Demolishes Threadripper 3990X in New Benchmarks

Intel Materials on Blockscale
(Image credit: Intel)

New benchmark results for Intel’s upcoming 52-core Sapphire Rapids Xeon Platinum 8470 have surfaced online, showing impressive performance from Intel's new Sapphire Rapids architecture. As shared by Twitter leaker @yuuki_ans, the new Xeon was able to outperform AMD’s 64 Core Threadripper 3990X in a multitude of benchmarks including Cinebench R15, R20, R23, CPU-Z, and V-Ray.

As usual, note that these results are not official, so take them with a grain of salt. Sapphire Rapids is still in development, so performance is subject to change before release.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Aaron Klotz
Contributing Writer

Aaron Klotz is a contributing writer for Tom’s Hardware, covering news related to computer hardware such as CPUs, and graphics cards.

  • Roland Of Gilead
    So, the new 52 core chip is faster than the 3990x 64 core chip (a two year old CPU). Not that impressive! Or is it just me?
    Reply
  • Smoosh Package
    keith12 said:
    So, the new 52 core chip is faster than the 3990x 64 core chip (a two year old CPU). Not that impressive! Or is it just me?
    Absolutely pointless article and benchmark comparison. Why not compare the Xeon to a new Epyc chip?
    Just makes Intel seem like a tryhard. But hey, at least they're now faster than a 2yo discontinued HEDT desktop cpu. Yay! Congrats Intel! 🥳
    Reply
  • Utensil999
    Click bate nonsence headline. 3% is hardly demolishing a 2yo processor. 🤦‍♂️
    Reply
  • ibm650
    If AMD was not around, we would see minimal improvements each year.
    Reply
  • spongiemaster
    ibm650 said:
    If AMD was not around, we would see minimal improvements each year.
    By the time Zen4 is announced, AMD will have gone 2 years or more without releasing a CPU faster than the 5950x. Intel has never done that no matter how much ahead of AMD they were.
    Reply
  • jacob249358
    keith12 said:
    So, the new 52 core chip is faster than the 3990x 64 core chip (a two year old CPU). Not that impressive! Or is it just me?
    yeah especially because sapphire rapids is for servers not workstations like the thread rippers. And Im sure the 5990wx or whatever will beat it anyways. I'm hoping the 5000 thread rippers will have come decent single core so it can replace my gaming PC and be my workstation.
    Reply
  • KyaraM
    ibm650 said:
    If AMD was not around, we would see minimal improvements each year.
    If AMD had not been stupid, we wouldn't even have seen that happen. Oooorrrr we would be in the same situation now, since improvement is limited. Take a guess.

    Also, at least Intel did improve things, of only a little. When did Vermeer drop again? Oh, right. Almost 2 years ago. I wrirdly seem to remember that Intel did at least something in those two years. Funny.
    Reply
  • Neilbob
    I wonder at what sort of power consumption this 'demolishing' is taking place.
    Reply
  • Smoosh Package said:
    Absolutely pointless article and benchmark comparison. Why not compare the Xeon to a new Epyc chip?
    Just makes Intel seem like a tryhard. But hey, at least they're now faster than a 2yo discontinued HEDT desktop cpu. Yay! Congrats Intel! 🥳
    And the answer why not to compare those two is because the Intel would lose and loose badly
    Reply
  • spongiemaster
    Smoosh Package said:
    Absolutely pointless article and benchmark comparison. Why not compare the Xeon to a new Epyc chip?
    Just makes Intel seem like a tryhard. But hey, at least they're now faster than a 2yo discontinued HEDT desktop cpu. Yay! Congrats Intel! 🥳
    The leaker didn't post a comparison, just the results for the Intel system. The obvious answer to why Milan wasn't chosen for the comparison is because there are no posted results for the same tests. If the results are out there, why don't you go find them and post them here for the rest of us to see?
    Reply