Smart Modular Brings Optane Memory to AMD EPYC Servers

Smart Modular
(Image credit: Smart Modular)

One of the advantages that servers based on Intel's 2nd and 3rd Generation Xeon Scalable processors have over AMD EPYC-powered machines is support for Optane Persistent Memory modules that can be used to expand main memory capacity relatively cheaply--something that is important for many applications. But Smart Modular has developed a card that can add Optane PMMs to any machine. Ironically, the card is Intel-based. 

Apparently, demand for storage-class memory on existing AMD and Arm machines is significant enough to encourage Smart Modular to develop its special Kestral PCIe Optane add-in-card for these servers. The Kestral PCIe Optane AIC carries up to four 512GB Intel Optane Persistent Memory modules and can be plugged into any PCIe 3.0/4.0 x16 slot to add up to 2TB of Optane memory. A PCIe Gen4 x16 slot supports a peak bandwidth of 32GBps in each direction, which is higher when compared to one DDR4-3200 memory channel (25.6 GBps), but is lower when compared four DDR4 channels (102.4 GBps). 

Anton Shilov
Contributing Writer

Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.

  • TerryLaze
    abufrejoval said:
    But to see that Intel's attempt to the make runner-up phase change materials exclusive to Intel has finally failed, is actually a bit sweet.
    You still need an intel system to make it show up as ram, this is just ram on a pci card which is nothing new, it only shows up as storage, which is something compared to nothing at all but it doesn't give you all the major benefits.
    Reply
  • msroadkill612
    ur above my pay grade, but yes, i was going to say "virtual memory", & yes - if anything that sounds simpler to adapt software to than mixing nand into ram slots.

    To this newb it seems surreal that intel cunningly made their strategic optane weapon so exclusive, that nobody came onboard, & a potential hit product just withered away.
    Reply
  • msroadkill612
    abufrejoval said:
    Surreal or not, a potential monopoly holds such terrible attraction an IT company will spend billions to get there.

    Intel's earliest trauma was losing the DRAM market to Japanese commodity makers in the mid 1980's.

    And then Intel has learned from IBM's mainframe business which maintained ECL-class exclusivity even after switching to CMOS commodity technology.

    It also owes most of its success to being able to kick out the proprietary Unix market with the price point that commodity PC based ISA technology offered.

    Intel consistently dreams up ways of selling exclusive value at commodity production cost. They always dream big and they have failed big quite a few times already. And because the industry knows exactly what Intel is trying to achieve, often enough they have refused to go where Intel wanted them (e.g. Itanium, Xeon Phi, Omnipath), because they knew they'd have to pay heavily once the dependency was there.
    Ta for the cool history lesson.
    We may well be witnessing an historic mortal miscalculation this time, with their haughty view of any threat by AMD to the core of their hegemony.
    If it is as u say, the big buyers must love the new deal & embrace it warmly.
    Reply