Steam Deck Hands-On: PC Gaming in My Hands

Steam Deck
(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

Less than a month ago, Valve announced the Steam Deck, its AMD Zen 2-based take on portable PC gaming. The next day, pre-orders opened, making all of Steam, the company's launcher and game distribution store creak under the load, signalling vast interest in the Steam Deck, as it was swiftly backordered to Q2 2022. We had the opportunity to go hands-on with the handheld at Valve's headquarters in Bellevue, Washington to see what you'll get before you need to finalize that reservation when the device starts shipping this December.

The major caveats to keep in mind are that what we saw was not the finalized hardware or software, but rather Valve's "EV2" prototypes, which will be shipping to developers as the official launch approaches. So while the device isn't finalized, it's pretty close. The biggest changes you might see, people who work on the console told me, are largely fit and finish, including the possibility of some different plastics, as well as a bunch of work to get the software done in time for launch.

I primarily got to spend my time with the 512GB model, the high-end, $699 device with the etched-glass, anti-glare display. That being said, a unit with the glossy display was there, too. More on the display differences later.

The games pre-installed on the units (I could not install games of my choice, nor could I log into my account) were on a mix of the internal storage and an SD card.

Andrew E. Freedman
Senior Editor

Andrew E. Freedman is a senior editor at Tom's Hardware focusing on laptops, desktops and gaming. He also keeps up with the latest news. A lover of all things gaming and tech, his previous work has shown up in Tom's Guide, Laptop Mag, Kotaku, PCMag and Complex, among others. Follow him on Threads @FreedmanAE and BlueSky @andrewfreedman.net. You can send him tips on Signal: andrewfreedman.01

  • Alvar "Miles" Udell
    What I don't get is why they didn't use a lot of that dead space on the back for an external battery pack slot, either for their own custom designed battery or an adapter so you can store and use any high output battery pack.
    Reply
  • excalibur1814
    Please, PLEASE, don't waste your money or, at least, wait for it to hit eBay.
    Reply
  • TCA_ChinChin
    Alvar Miles Udell said:
    What I don't get is why they didn't use a lot of that dead space on the back for an external battery pack slot, either for their own custom designed battery or an adapter so you can store and use any high output battery pack.
    I'm just spitballing here but maybe for thermal/acoustics? Just a guess here, but perhaps more battery or some other feature that would actually fill the space would cause an increase in thermal load which would make it unreasonably warm to hold or would require the fans to be much more audible than desired. Maybe it's even due a larger battery causing an increase in weight of an already hefty device?
    Reply
  • Alvar "Miles" Udell
    TCA_ChinChin said:
    I'm just spitballing here but maybe for thermal/acoustics? Just a guess here, but perhaps more battery or some other feature that would actually fill the space would cause an increase in thermal load which would make it unreasonably warm to hold or would require the fans to be much more audible than desired. Maybe it's even due a larger battery causing an increase in weight of an already hefty device?

    A little bit of weight compared to as little as 2 hours of battery life? I think most people would take a little bit of weight.
    Reply
  • vmem
    Alvar Miles Udell said:
    A little bit of weight compared to as little as 2 hours of battery life? I think most people would take a little bit of weight.

    This could just be me, but I find myself looking for places to rest my arm after playing the switch for 3-4 hours. The switch is only 0.66lb whereas the Steam Deck is 1.47lB. If we added a battery and made it say 2lb or 3lb (these things are mostly battery by weight anyway), I can see people struggling to hold it up for long enough for the battery to make sense. Think about it this way, if you're going to end up looking for a surface to set it down or rest your arms on, you might as well be bringing a batterypack along. I pre-ordered mine and we'll see how I feel after playing with it, but I hope they made the right compromise between battery vs weight.
    Reply
  • Ticktok
    Alvar Miles Udell said:
    What I don't get is why they didn't use a lot of that dead space on the back for an external battery pack slot, either for their own custom designed battery or an adapter so you can store and use any high output battery pack.

    With the USB-C charging there's not really a need. There's already so many large capacity external battery packs, especially with the Nintendo Switch and the Mac book charging that way, that for any extra gaming time you could use/carry one of those. I already have a couple large capacity high output usb-c battery packs for my phone and nintendo switch.

    And like other people said, it would add too much to the weight and affect the cooling routing. Why complicate either of those when the usb-c charging packs already exist.
    Reply
  • Sleepy_Hollowed
    Nice, if it can play control on low, it can play anything on low (my GTX 1080 has massive struggles with it, more than cyberpunk on low).

    Hopefully if it catches on, it might receive optimizations on newer games. Seems like a solid little device for a quick couch game or on the go with a battery pack.

    The screen though…the top model all the way if you travel, too bad that it’s not an option on the others.
    Reply
  • Bmuduoy
    excalibur1814 said:
    Please, PLEASE, don't waste your money or, at least, wait for it to hit eBay.
    Why do you care so much? Is it made of babies or what?
    Reply
  • mitch074
    From experience, Proton has little impact on game performance, driver optimization and graphics API have a lot more. If the game is using DX11, it'll probably be choppy; OpenGL or Vulkan, on the other hand, it's very likely to work well, and in the former case, better than on Windows (free AMD drivers on Linux got a grounds up rewrite a few years ago). DX12 is all or nothing. DX9 might actually run better than on Windows.
    Reply
  • leadpoop
    Personally, if the device can play 95% of games at with at least 30 fps or better, and deliver their advertised battery life, then I look forward to using the device. I am not a hard core gamer, nor do I care about top notch graphics, but if I can pick up the device and play a bit here, or there. Sign me up.
    Reply