Superconductor Breakthrough Findings Replicated, Twice, in Preliminary Testing

Superconductor image
(Image credit: Shutterstock)

Humanity may be in the throes of another breakthrough that's every bit as impactful as the invention of the transistor and the advent (and eventual vindication) of quantum computing. LK-99, as it's been named, is a new compound that researchers believe will enable the fabrication of room-temperature, ambient-pressure superconductors. Initially published by a Korean team last Friday, frantic work is underway throughout the research world to validate the paper's claims. For now, two separate sources have already provided preliminary confirmations that this might actually be the real thing — Chinese researchers have even posted video proof. Strap in, this is a maglev-powered, superconducting ride.

Superconductors, a wild category of compounds that can conduct electricity without any losses, have been a metaphorical goose chase for years now, with multiple research teams claiming (and then retracting) papers and announcements of its achievement. The reason is simple: Few things come close to the potential of an actual superconductor discovery in terms of what it can do for humanity's current and future technology. Imagine if your 16-core mainstream CPU (which likely requires a competent watercooling solution to avoid incinerating itself) operated without power losses — no current leakage, no electricity waste in the form of heat. Superconductors mean almost perfectly efficient computing.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Francisco Pires
Freelance News Writer

Francisco Pires is a freelance news writer for Tom's Hardware with a soft side for quantum computing.

  • InvalidError
    As with many scientific discoveries, discovering something seemingly revolutionary often ends up in disappointment when the discovery cannot be turned into anything actually usable.

    LK-99 might be real, though you still need to grow the crystals to usable sizes and shapes. A superconductor will have limited uses if you cannot cost-effectively make wires, discs, cylinders and other basic yet very handy shapes from it.
    Reply
  • A Stoner
    Next up, room temperature fusion!
    Reply
  • thisisaname
    InvalidError said:
    As with many scientific discoveries, discovering something seemingly revolutionary often ends up in disappointment when the discovery cannot be turned into anything actually usable.

    LK-99 might be real, though you still need to grow the crystals to usable sizes and shapes. A superconductor will have limited uses if you cannot cost-effectively make wires, discs, cylinders and other basic yet very handy shapes from it.
    Yes going from how rough the disc looked the material may be quite difficult to shape. Going to be interesting see how this progresses.
    Reply
  • InvalidError
    thisisaname said:
    Yes going from how rough the disc looked the material may be quite difficult to shape. Going to be interesting see how this progresses.
    They said themselves that the reason the disc wasn't levitating well was likely due to excess impurities. The disc looked so crumbly likely because it is just a clump of little crystals held together by leftovers, not a single somewhat cohesive chunk.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    Reply
  • garylcamp
    There still seems some skepticism as an article in Science 2 reports a failure to duplicate. But things are moving fast so I expect more clarity soon. Note that, like Fusion or voice recognition, it may not be as easy as it appears at first. Need more info on making useful material to decide.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    Imagine if your 16-core mainstream CPU (which likely requires a competent watercooling solution to avoid incinerating itself) operated without power losses — no current leakage, no electricity waste in the form of heat. Superconductors mean almost perfectly efficient computing.
    Even if there are room-temperature superconductors that we could use in CPUs, is this statement even credible? Doesn't a lot of the power dissipation of modern CPUs come from leakage and transistor-switching?
    https://www.allaboutcircuits.com/technical-articles/switching-losses-effects-on-semiconductors/
    Reply
  • bit_user
    InvalidError said:
    As with many scientific discoveries, discovering something seemingly revolutionary often ends up in disappointment when the discovery cannot be turned into anything actually usable.

    LK-99 might be real, though you still need to grow the crystals to usable sizes and shapes. A superconductor will have limited uses if you cannot cost-effectively make wires, discs, cylinders and other basic yet very handy shapes from it.
    A bit like why Graphene has taken so long to find commercially viable applications?

    But, unlike Graphene, there might be other materials in this same category that are easier to manufacture at scale.
    Reply
  • toffty
    LK99 is not a super conductor

    RjzL9cS3VW8:34View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=RjzL9cS3VW8&t=34
    Reply
  • InvalidError
    bit_user said:
    Even if there are room-temperature superconductors that we could use in CPUs, is this statement even credible? Doesn't a lot of the power dissipation of modern CPUs come from leakage and transistor-switching?
    Leakage comes from the extreme proximity between traces, I don't think superconductors will do anything about that and leakage is becoming an increasingly significant loss factor as things get packed tighter together. CMOS logic works by charging and discharging gates, the amount of energy spent charging or discharging gate capacitors is Q=Cg*V^2/2, superconductors aren't going to change that either, nor the energy associated with charging and discharging the remainder of parasitic trace capacitances. The only thing superconductors might change is trace conduction losses assuming you can shape crystals in a way that lets you put them on wafers.

    Carbon nanotubes were hyped as the solution to semiconductor copper losses 20 years ago. I don't remember the last time I read about any sign of progress on that. Getting tubes to grow to the necessary lengths and self-assemble on a wafer sounds like extremely tricky business.

    bit_user said:
    A bit like why Graphene has taken so long to find commercially viable applications?

    But, unlike Graphene, there might be other materials in this same category that are easier to manufacture at scale.
    Graphene has plenty of applications when you only need micron-sized flakes... such as thermal pastes, high-performance greases and pencil leads :)

    Likewise, if LK-99 is real but can only be made in micron-sized flakes, I it may still be useful in less glamorous applications such as magnetic filler in ferrite-like transformer and induction motor cores to eliminate most of the remaining eddy current losses there assuming it can also bear the associated current and magnetic flux densities before quenching.

    No shortage of things that can go wrong besides the LK-99 experiment turning out to be a hoax.
    Reply