TSMC Workers Routinely Asked to Find 'Bomb' Notes in Machinery: Report

TSMC manufacturing
(Image credit: TSMC)

TSMC clean room workers are routinely tasked with finding 'bombs' in machinery, according to Taiwan's United News Network (UDN). We have put 'bombs' in inverted commas, as the staff undertaking equipment testing and maintenance will find sticky notes with 'bomb' written on them located on various components instead of potentially explosive devices.

UDN based its report on anonymous TSMC employee chitchat on social media, so we must add a pinch of salt to this eyebrow-raising work practice. However, we understand that the 'bomb-finding' appears to work as follows:

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Mark Tyson
News Editor

Mark Tyson is a news editor at Tom's Hardware. He enjoys covering the full breadth of PC tech; from business and semiconductor design to products approaching the edge of reason.

  • georgebaker437
    This actually sounds like a good idea. The negative reinforcement is just stupid, though. A small "value" reward would put as positive spin on this program, cost relatively little, and be met with enthusiasm by the worker. It is always better to lead with a carrot than to drive with a stick.
    Reply
  • TechieTwo
    So make it free ice cream for each post-it note they find.
    Reply
  • Endymio
    georgebaker437 said:
    It is always better to lead with a carrot than to drive with a stick.
    By that logic, we should simply pay people a small stipend to not commit rape, assault, and murder ... and never criminally charge those who do. I realize a few areas of the country are moving in this direction, but so far that experiment hasn't been very successful.
    Reply
  • King_V
    Endymio said:
    By that logic, we should simply pay people a small stipend to not commit rape, assault, and murder ... and never criminally charge those who do. I realize a few areas of the country are moving in this direction, but so far that experiment hasn't been very successful.
    That's an extremely poor analogy. This is incentivizing extra effort, not bribing to avoid effort-toward-violent-behavior.

    By your logic, there should never be bonuses or merit raises.
    Reply
  • King_V
    On a lighter note, I, sadly, might be the smartass who'd love shouting out "HOLY CRAP THERE'S A BOMB IN HERE!!"
    Reply
  • helper800
    King_V said:
    On a lighter note, I, sadly, might be the smartass who'd love shouting out "HOLY CRAP THERE'S A BOMB IN HERE!!"
    *TSA glare intensifies*
    Reply
  • helper800
    Endymio said:
    By that logic, we should simply pay people a small stipend to not commit rape, assault, and murder ... and never criminally charge those who do. I realize a few areas of the country are moving in this direction, but so far that experiment hasn't been very successful.
    I do not believe he is making a generalized statement on human psychology and the ways it benefits from negative and positive reinforcement. He is being very specific. He is stating that at TSMC and in business, it is better overall to use positive reinforcement instead of negative for this particular circumstance.
    Reply
  • Endymio
    King_V said:
    This is incentivizing extra effort
    Since when did doing your job become "extra effort"? They're hired to inspect machinery. This ensures they do it. And companies incentivize their workers by paying them a good salary -- and TSMC's average salary tops $100K per year -- far above the average for the island. I realize the younger generation dearly craves a work environment where no business would dare give an employee a negative performance review, but sometimes it is indeed necessary.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    I wonder if this incident (or similar) is what inspired it:
    https://www.anandtech.com/show/13975/tsmcs-fab-14b-photoresist-material-incident-550-million-in-lost-revenue
    Also, I tend to agree with @Endymio that negative reinforcement for not doing your job properly is a more effective strategy, when the consequences can be extremely dire. Laziness can easily overcome the desire to pursue small positive incentives, and they're very unlikely to go with a big positive incentive, because then they couldn't afford to deploy it as frequently.
    Reply
  • TechieTwo said:
    So make it free ice cream for each post-it note they find.
    What if they’re diabetic? 😀
    Reply