Intel Releases 3 "Upgrade Cards" for Sandy Bridge

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Kevin Parrish
Contributor

Kevin Parrish has over a decade of experience as a writer, editor, and product tester. His work focused on computer hardware, networking equipment, smartphones, tablets, gaming consoles, and other internet-connected devices. His work has appeared in Tom's Hardware, Tom's Guide, Maximum PC, Digital Trends, Android Authority, How-To Geek, Lifewire, and others.

  • bak0n
    So if I'm understanding this correctly, Intel is selling a faster CPU that you have to pay extra to fully use?
    Reply
  • big_BDS
    This is the dumbest thing ever, will just go with AMD then I know what I'm paying for is what I'm getting.
    Reply
  • jblack
    Wouldn't it be great if Intel would tell you exactly what you were getting instead of "15% faster" with increases in Frequency/Cache?

    I've looked on Intel's site and they don't list the specs for the upgraded models anywhere.
    Reply
  • IzzyCraft
    Herp this is what happens when amd can't compete intel can artificially cripple their cpus to match amd's power/price point and still turn a profit, while at the same time turn even more of a profit selling keys to unlock more power from the cpus.
    Reply
  • You do realize that the lower end processors are just high end processors with certain features disabled?

    AMD does not make ANY triple core processors, they are quads with one core disabled...

    Pretty much every modern intel has the architecture to support hyperthreading, it's just disabled on certain models by the firmware.
    Reply
  • dread_cthulhu
    Yeah, this is profiteering at its finest... I'll stick with AMD, thanks...
    Reply
  • Confused Turtle
    big_BDSThis is the dumbest thing ever, will just go with AMD then I know what I'm paying for is what I'm getting.
    I've heard of people unlocking cores on their AMD processors. They throttle stuff too; they just don't offer upgrades. If you had purchased one of these throttled Intel processors earlier, you would still get the performance you originally expected from them.

    I don't like the idea of disabling hardware as part of the bleed you for every cent scheme myself. But the worst thing you can do for a cause is give bad arguments for it.
    Reply
  • kastraelie
    Frankly I'm shocked. Not at Intel but at my friends and others I see on the net who think this is some new form of profiteering that hasn't been seen/done before...

    This is what AMD, Nvidia, ATI, and Intel have been doing for well over a decade now...except now when Intel makes it easier, cheaper, and open to everyone people complain. People really must be slow to catch on.

    It used to be you bought an artificially slower chip from the factory, and if you wanted to upgrade you replaced the ENTIRE chip--spending more money and having the hassle of taking it out of your system and installing a new one. Now you just pay an extra 50 bucks and instantly make it faster...

    With GPU manufacturers it is the same thing...release the top end chip and keep disabling/removing features from it and selling it at lower price points to cover your market.

    Yes, sometimes they go "up" by adding faster memory or "unlocking" the multipliers...but it essentially the same thing. Like sticking a Cobra sticker on your v6 mustang.

    Reply
  • gto127
    So basically intel is charging you to unlock their cores so you can overclock & have a little more cache. No thanks. I'm waiting for Bulldozer.
    Reply
  • beenthere
    You're a fool if you pay $50 extra for these trivial upgrades.
    Reply