Arctic uses a fan to cool another fan — S12038-4K 120mm fan adds an extra fan in its center to cool its central shaft

A computer server fan, with unusual additional fan blades in its direct center, where is normally a solid circle.
(Image credit: Arctic GmbH)

Arctic has released a new cooling fan archetype for server use, the S12038-4K and -8K. The fan is instantly visually unique thanks to its seven bonus fan blades in its direct center, creating a fan-within-a-fan effect. The fan offers class-leading static pressure, though Arctic seems reticent to advertise its new standout.

The S12038's spec sheet is rather impressive on several fronts. Its advertised power consumption at max load, 3.96W, is 12% lower than the next closest server-grade competitor. It generates an insane 11.45 mmH₂O of static pressure, around 3X-6X greater than Arctic's stable of standard case fans. This high static pressure and airflow level is near the best in class for server hardware. As the name implies, the S12038 can be had in flavors of 4,000 or 8,000 maximum RPM.

TOPICS
Sunny Grimm
Contributing Writer

Sunny Grimm is a contributing writer for Tom's Hardware. He has been building and breaking computers since 2017, serving as the resident youngster at Tom's. From APUs to RGB, Sunny has a handle on all the latest tech news.

  • Kamen Rider Blade
    I think the next step in "Case Fan" tech evolution is to go back to look at
    TMD (Tip Magnetic Drive) and implement it in the best possible form.

    Benefits:
    1) You narrow the center Dead zone down to a 5mm diameter which is "Good Enough".
    2) With Magnetic Bearings, the hub of the fan can literally float on a cushion of air/oil
    3) You move the EM Coil Windings to the 4x outter edges, ergo spreading the heat load.
    4) Your fan design will always have a closed outter wheel edge, so you get rid of tip vortices inherently by closing the fan blade tip edges.
    5) You have a Larger Surface Area for air to move through with "Less Obstruction"
    6) AlphaCool has proven that you can "De-Couple" the fan components from the frame components of the fans and get better noise characteristics, the next step is to open things up and use the metal housing as "HeatSinks" for the EM Coil Windings at the edges. to help with cooling.
    Reply
  • Zenthar
    For the curious, about how loud those are, Tom had a news about the 8K variant with some videos.
    Reply
  • Phaaze88
    I clicked on the article expecting to see a certain meme, and was not disappointed.
    Reply
  • 80251
    Nice fan for a cheap price. Longevity is an important fan performance metric in a data center. Power is too and this fan seems to have a too good power draw metric: 3.96 watts for a 4000RPM, 120x38mm fan.
    It's weird how Arctic have distanced themselves from their own fan design.
    Here's a review from Amazon:
    'It also didn't help that Arctic refused to answer questions on their reddit sub about these fans.'
    Bizarre.
    Reply
  • thisisaname
    Next step would be a fan for the fans fan.
    Reply
  • Notton
    Kamen Rider Blade said:
    I think the next step in "Case Fan" tech evolution is to go back to look at
    TMD (Tip Magnetic Drive) and implement it in the best possible form.
    No, it ain't.
    This is basic math, like Gr.7 levels

    10.5cm fan blade w/ 1cm hub (diameter)
    area of fan blades: 86.59cm² - 3.14cm² = 83.45cm²

    11.5cm fan blade w/ 2cm hub (diameter)
    area of fan blades: 103.87cm² - 12.57cm² = 91.3cm²

    And that doesn't even get into the highly technical aspects of fan blade design. The gist of it is, bigger and slower is better than smaller and faster, even with a slight loss of static pressure. The only reason to go small and fast is because of size constraints.
    It's better to change the fan thickness and geometry.
    Reply
  • yakidd
    They should've named it Fan²
    Reply
  • 80251
    @Kamen Rider Blade
    How efficient were those TMD fans? Did they produce similar or better CFM/static pressure than traditional radial axial fans of the same size?
    Reply
  • Kamen Rider Blade
    Notton said:
    And that doesn't even get into the highly technical aspects of fan blade design. The gist of it is, bigger and slower is better than smaller and faster, even with a slight loss of static pressure. The only reason to go small and fast is because of size constraints.
    I don't disagree with you on those points, "Bigger & Slower" = Less Noise.

    But I'm applying the TMD design principle to fans of ALL sizes.

    Ranging from 4 cm to 20 cm in Case Fan sizes.

    Notton said:

    It's better to change the fan thickness and geometry.
    I concur, but 25 mm remains the most popular thickness, I to want "THICC" fans for certain specific applications.

    80251 said:
    @Kamen Rider Blade
    How efficient were those TMD fans? Did they produce similar or better CFM/static pressure than traditional radial axial fans of the same size?
    They made 1x model, it was 70 mm (Why, 70?, I have no idea as to why that was the first design size to be chosen).

    They cranked it up to 5800 RPM as the upper limit.

    http://www.dansdata.com/tmdfan.htm
    So while it was "Noisy", it wasn't as bad as other fans in that RPM range.
    Reply
  • 80251
    @Kamen Rider Blade
    That article you cited points out some of the downsides associated w/TMD fans. For one thing, the outer impeller ring has to be supported while it spins. On a 70mm fan thin struts might work, but on larger fans this might not work (i.e. because the fan blades are larger and heavier) so you would need some sort of bearing race to support the outer impeller ring, which adds more friction -- especially considering the linear velocity with which this outer impeller ring bearing race would have to rotate -- and the fact you would have to more than two ball bearings to support it. Maybe a Sunon maglev type solution could be adapted for this though.
    I hope some industrial fan manufacturer somewhere is working on next-gen TMD fans or maybe even some drone manufacturers.
    Reply