Noctua NH-P1 Review: For those who demand silence

Noctua’s NH-P1 doesn't need fans to perform well

Noctua NH-P1
Editor's Choice
(Image: © Tom's Hardware)

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

Because this cooler isn’t quite comparable to traditional models on the market, we’re going to look at its performance differently than previous reviews. We’ll start by looking at performance with AMD Ryzen 7700X and 9950X3D, then switch over to looking at Intel’s Core i7-14700K and i9-13900K.

AMD Ryzen 7 7700X

Over the course of ten minutes, the NH-P1 was able to sustain an average of 102W cooled. The workload run was Cinebench R23 multi-core benchmark test, the idea being to push the CPU to its thermal limits.

I feel like people should keep in mind when reading this review — these benchmark tests are worst case scenarios. Common usage scenarios — especially workloads like gaming, watching videos, office work, or web browsing — will be far less stressful — and as such, the NH-P1 will provide full performance in these less-intensive situations.

Noctua NH-P1

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

By extending our testing to thirty minutes long to satisfy the most picky of our readers, the average power cooled drops to an average of 85W – plateauing at 75W cooled at the end of testing. That number on its own might seem unimpressive, until you consider that Ryzen 7700X’s eco mode only consumes a maximum of 65W.

What this means is that unless you need the absolute fastest performance, Noctua’s NH-P1 will provide plenty of cooling power for common needs. The way I test coolers is much more intensive than normal usage. Other authors here at Tom’s Hardware have previously examined AMD’s Ryzen 3900 to show how much (or little) is lost with ECO mode on Ryzen systems - and we’ll cover benchmark performance in the next section covering AMD’s Ryzen 9 9950X3D.

Noctua NH-P1

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D

We’re going to look at performance with AMD’s flagship Ryzen 9 9950X3D in two different graphs. First we’ll look at the performance of the cooler by looking at how many watts it can handle.

Noctua NH-P1

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

In the default configuration, Noctua’s NH-P1 is able to handle about 80% of the maximum stock heat output of AMD’s Ryzen 9 9950X3D in intense workloads. Installing a fan on the NH-P1 increases that figure to 93%. This is pretty impressive, especially when these benchmark tests are worst case scenarios.

But how does that loss of power consumption translate into benchmark results? Less than one would think! You might be surprised by the benchmark scores of Cinebench R23’s multi-core test.

Noctua NH-P1

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

The default performance of AMD’s Ryzen 9 9950X3D will result in a 10 minute run of Cinebench R23 multi-core score of about 42,000 points. In its stock configuration of the NH-P1, that score drops to 37K due to thermal throttling. Adding a single fan to the cooler bridges that gap, bringing the score up to 40K – a mere 2,000 away from stock performance.

Intel Core i9-13900K

Intel’s i9-13900K is amongst the most difficult to cool CPUs still relevant in today’s market. Even if you set a 200W power limit, the CPU will reach TJMax with Noctua’s NH-P1 after 2.5 minutes of an intensive workload.

Noctua NH-P1

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

With power limits removed in BIOS settings, Noctua’s heatsink can handle about 213W with Intel’s Core i9-13900K over the course of ten minutes when a fan is added to the cooler.

Noctua NH-P1

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

But how about long term performance, without a fan? You might be surprised, but the NH-P1 was able to handle more than the PL1 of 125W! At the end of 45 minutes, the cooler was still dissipating 150W. That’s the longest test I’ve ever done for testing a cooler, and I highly doubt testing longer would produce different results. After 45 minutes, the cooler has been fully saturated and performance will plateau.

Noctua NH-P1

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

Intel Core i7-14700K

Lastly, we’ve tested Noctua’s fanless solution with Intel’s “Raptor Lake” Core i7-14700K – another CPU which is fairly difficult to cool.

Noctua NH-P1

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

In its default configuration, horizontally mounted, the CPU’s power consumption dropped to an average of 160W in a basic ten-minute test. Changing the orientation of the cooler’s installation improved performance significantly, increasing to 184W.

Finally, adding a fan increased total cooling capacity to 206W – plenty powerful enough for most users, especially in common scenarios.

Conclusion

Noctua NH-P1

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

Noctua’s NH-P1 is a unique fanless cooler that offers completely silent performance, at the cost of slightly reduced cooling power. You won’t look at this if you need every last bit of performance for overclocking, but rather if you’re a user who prefers quiet and has more common workloads.

Even if you do run intense multi-core workloads, there won’t be much of a performance loss – as shown with our Cinebench R23 tests using AMD’s Ryzen 9 9950X3D.

At this time, not only is Noctua’s NH-P1 the strongest fanless solution available for common users – it is also the only one that is easily available for purchase. The $119 USD price tag might be difficult to swallow, but that’s the price of a niche product with strong performance.

Albert Thomas
Freelancer, CPU Cooling Reviewer

Albert Thomas is a contributor for Tom’s Hardware, primarily covering CPU cooling reviews.

  • bit_user
    Thanks for the review, Albert! I have yet to go through it in detail, but I didn't see the weight specified. Noctua claims it's 1180 g. This is exactly the same weight as they claim for their NH-D15 G2 (without fans).
    https://noctua.at/en/nh-p1/specification
    Reply
  • Amdlova
    Nice review! maybe one day get one :)
    Reply
  • bill001g
    I wonder if you can actually run without any fans. In effect it just replaces the cpu cooler fans with the case fans. Case fans tend to be louder just because they are closer to the outside. If it was just in a open air mount with little air flow from say a room fan I wonder how well it cools.
    Reply
  • Albert.Thomas
    bill001g said:
    I wonder if you can actually run without any fans. In effect it just replaces the cpu cooler fans with the case fans. Case fans tend to be louder just because they are closer to the outside. If it was just in a open air mount with little air flow from say a room fan I wonder how well it cools.
    Most users run this air cooler in an "open" setup, so it kinda balances out ;)
    Reply
  • razor512
    They should make a version with a cold plate designed for m.2SSDs, and a fin and heatpipe design designed to shift the cooler over the CPU area, and then they can push a design of a Noctua CLC for the CPU, and a NH-P1 for the SSD.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    razor512 said:
    They should make a version with a cold plate designed for m.2SSDs,
    The M.2 slot has a specified max power dissipation around 12W. Also, it has way less mechanical strength than a CPU slot. So, there are going to be much lower limits on what you can physically fit, and that's not even considering what else is near the slot (i.e. GPUs, other SSDs with coolers, etc.). But, that's okay, since there's also much less need for cooling capacity.
    Reply
  • DingusDog
    bill001g said:
    I wonder if you can actually run without any fans. In effect it just replaces the cpu cooler fans with the case fans. Case fans tend to be louder just because they are closer to the outside. If it was just in a open air mount with little air flow from say a room fan I wonder how well it cools.
    I respectfully disagree, case fans can be set on a less aggressive curve maintaining steady rpm while a CPU fan will need to rev up depending on load. Also depends on the brand I'm running 4 Corsair QL140 and 3 QL120 case fans and my AIO pump is still the most (but barely) audible component.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    DingusDog said:
    I respectfully disagree, case fans can be set on a less aggressive curve maintaining steady rpm while a CPU fan will need to rev up depending on load.
    If you want constant or variable fan RPM, that's just a question of how you configure your fan curves, regardless of whether we're talking about a CPU fan or case fans.

    If you're using a passive heatsink with case fans and you don't configure variable RPMs for your case fans, then you risk the CPU hitting its thermal ceiling early.

    There's no free lunch, here.
    Reply
  • salgado18
    Interesting review, but the only cpu with comparative performance is the AMD. How much performance can I expect from using it? What about a graph of performance over time? I think it feels more like just a quick test than a proper Tom's Hardware review.
    Reply
  • thestryker
    As interesting as I find this cooler it doesn't really seem to have a place outside of a passive system. I suppose if someone was really sensitive to the pitch of the sound of fans pushing through dense fins that could be a benefit.
    Reply