Thermalright Royal Pretor 130 Review: The Crown Jewel of Air Cooling

Once again, Thermalright raises the bar for what’s considered possible with air cooling.

Thermalright Royal Pretor 130
Editor's Choice
(Image credit: © Tom's Hardware)

Tom's Hardware Verdict

This is simply the best air cooler on the market, exceeding my expectations for what air cooling can offer. You won’t find better performance without using liquid cooling.

Reasons to buy

  • +

    Strongest air-cooling performance I’ve tested yet

  • +

    Competitive with entry-level 360mm AIOs

  • +

    Exceptional noise-normalized performance

  • +

    Reasonable $52.90 US price

Reasons to avoid

  • -

    None!

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

In ancient Rome, the term Pretor (more commonly spelled Praetor) was given to magistrates and commanders of armies – and boy, does the title fit Thermalrights' latest flagship air cooler, the Royal Pretor 130. The performance of this latest product is ferocious, blurring the lines between what you should expect from air and liquid coolers.

Will the Royal Pretor 130 make our list of the best coolers? Yes. As we’ll see in testing, it’s the best air cooler on the market! Let’s take a look at the specifications and features of the cooler, then we’ll go over thermal performance with both Intel and AMD CPUs, as well as noise levels.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Albert Thomas
Freelancer, CPU Cooling Reviewer

Albert Thomas is a contributor for Tom’s Hardware, primarily covering CPU cooling reviews.

  • Roland Of Gilead
    Jeez, Thermalright are just knocking it out of the park with insane price performance for air coolers. The Phantom Spirit, Peerless Assassin and now this Pretor! Other companies should take a look at this and start producing the goods. And I don't mean a $100 Noctua.
    Reply
  • extremepcs1
    2 different fans is messing with my OCD :) Looks great otherwise!
    Reply
  • Albert.Thomas
    Roland Of Gilead said:
    Jeez, Thermalright are just knocking it out of the park with insane price performance for air coolers. The Phantom Spirit, Peerless Assassin and now this Pretor! Other companies should take a look at this and start producing the goods. And I don't mean a $100 Noctua.
    I know, right? I don't know how they keep doing it!
    Reply
  • Krieger-San
    I'm confused why they claim this is the best cooler when there's no comparisons to the NH-D15 (Noctua). It's been in the top 5 best CPU coolers of all time.
    Also, does this beat the Thermalright Silver Arrow? It uses 8mm heat pipes, it beat the NH-D15 in many tests.
    Reply
  • 2Be_or_Not2Be
    With these charts/graphics not allowing for zoom-in, it makes it hard to easily read all the names/numbers. I also don't know why we can't have increased/dynamic page width on these articles; the included charts could then be bigger by default as well. Most here have high-res screens, but it looks like these articles' page width is set to 800x600.
    Reply
  • Albert.Thomas
    Krieger-San said:
    I'm confused why they claim this is the best cooler when there's no comparisons to the NH-D15 (Noctua). It's been in the top 5 best CPU coolers of all time.
    I had to move away from Arkansas earlier this year due to some pretty horrifying conditions, and I was only able to bring so many coolers when I moved.

    That said, the Noctua NH-D1 is included on the Intel noise normalized results and on the maximum strength results.
    Krieger-San said:
    Also, does this beat the Thermalright Silver Arrow? It uses 8mm heat pipes, it beat the NH-D15 in many tests.
    That's a good question! I'm sure if Thermalright wants me to test it, they'll send a sample of this unit to me.
    Reply
  • Albert.Thomas
    2Be_or_Not2Be said:
    With these charts/graphics not allowing for zoom-in, it makes it hard to easily read all the names/numbers. I also don't know why we can't have increased/dynamic page width on these articles; the included charts could then be bigger by default as well. Most here have high-res screens, but it looks like these articles' page width is set to 800x600.
    I'm not sure what is going on here, as the graphs I submit are of higher resolution, but I'll bring it up to management
    Reply
  • btmedic04
    What is the maximum memory height supported without moving the fan up? I have a 7950x3d in a jonsbo D31 case, asus rog x670e gene and g.skill trident z neo ram and was initially looking at the phantom spirit evo, but my ram is a millimeter or two too tall to fit without raising the fan. If this can fit it without raising the fan, and has better performance to boot, then im all in
    Reply
  • uplink-svk
    Cons:
    - looks like 💩
    - RAM clearance
    Reply
  • Albert.Thomas
    uplink-svk said:
    Cons:
    - looks like 💩
    - RAM clearance
    What types of looks do you prefer?
    Reply