Intel slapped with class action lawsuit for Raptor Lake CPU instability issues — chipmaker accused of consciously selling defective chips

Raptor Lake
Raptor Lake (Image credit: Intel)

This week, a class action lawsuit was filed against Intel in a federal court. The plaintiff, Mark Vanvalkenburgh, accuses Intel of knowingly selling defective 13th Generation Raptor Lake and 14th Generation Raptor Lake Refresh processors. The plaintiff seeks damages and, in the alternative, restitution. Lawyers from Dovel & Luner expect other Intel customers to join the class action. There are some catches with this lawsuit.

The lawsuit, filed in San Jose, California, comes from Mark Vanvalkenburgh of Orchard Park, New York, who purchased an Intel Core i7-13700K processor in January 2023. According to the complaint, Vanvalkenburgh encountered frequent problems, including sudden screen blackouts and unexpected computer restarts. This summer, he attempted to apply an Intel patch intended to fix stability issues in the company’s Raptor Lake CPUs, but this solution failed to resolve the malfunctions.

“After purchasing the product, Plaintiff learned that the processor was defective, unstable, and crashing at high rates,” the lawsuit reads. “The processor caused issues in his computer, including random screen blackouts and random computer restarts. These issues were not resolved even after he attempted to install a patch issued by Intel for its 13th Generation processors. As a result, he did not get what he paid for. Had Plaintiff known the truth about the product, he would not have bought the product or would have paid less for it.”

The plaintiff asserts that Intel was aware of the instability problems with Raptor Lake CPUs before his purchase. He claims that the company’s internal testing, conducted before and after the processors’ release, revealed these defects. Despite this, Intel allegedly continued to market the processors as high-performance products without disclosing any potential for instability, raising accusations of fraud, breach of warranty, and violation of New York consumer protection laws.

In July 2024, Intel publicly addressed the problem called ‘Vmin Shift Instability,’ noting that stability issues stemmed from elevated operating voltage levels in its 13th Generation and 14th Generation Core’ Raptor Lake’ processors, which physically damaged the core’s clock tree circuit.

To mitigate the issue, Intel has released three microcode patches. The first patch (0x125) was issued in June to adjust the Enhanced Thermal Velocity Boost (eTVB) algorithm—the second patch (0x129), followed in August, aimed at reducing unnecessary high-voltage requests. In September, Intel released its third patch (0x12B), which combined the previous fixes and added protections to prevent excess voltage demands during idle or light load.

There is a catch, though: once the clock tree circuit is damaged, patches will not help, and a replacement is needed, something that Intel has been clear about. To ensure that all its customers got their replacements, Intel extended warranties on Raptor Lake CPUs by two years.

Apparently, the plaintiff considered replacing his CPU inadequate relief and decided to file a nationwide class action suit. He now seeks damages (including treble damages, statutory damages, and punitive damages where applicable), restitution, disgorgement, and an order awarding the plaintiff and all other class members damages in an amount to be determined at trial.

Anton Shilov
Contributing Writer

Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.

  • dimar
    Looks very fishy. Did he bother to test the RAM? What kind of CPU cooler was used?, etc..
    Reply
  • hotaru251
    While I think Intel did know something... the guys statement is kind of pointless.
    According to the complaint, Vanvalkenburgh encountered frequent problems, including sudden screen blackouts and unexpected computer restarts. This summer, he attempted to apply an Intel patch intended to fix stability issues in the company’s Raptor Lake CPUs, but this solution failed to resolve the malfunctions

    Intel states that the patch won't fix cpu's that already showed issues (as they are damaged and need replaced) and offers replacements.


    Proving Intel knew they were defective as a whole will be extremely up hill fight.
    Reply
  • dwd999
    But the question which will have to be answered in court, if it ever reaches trial, and in depositions of the plaintiffs, is whether or not they changed their motherboard's default settings for the cpus after installing the cpus. If they applied various overclocking settings, which they determined on their own accord, then Intel's defense will be that it was user error. (This is something that I support since I have an i9-13900K and it's always run fine because I haven't messed with the default settings other than turning on Turbo). The plaintiffs could lie about overclocking, and also contend that by leaving the chip unlocked Intel still does have some liability. But if I were on the jury I would side with Intel and view it as user error. And since Intel is willing to replace the cpus free of charge I doubt that a judge would view it as a trial worthy case. Or at some point 10 years from now, plaintiffs will receive some token payment like $20. (I got one of those from some mortgage related class action suit). Like most class action suits, the primary beneficiary is the lawyers who hope to generate high fees from deep pockets. Wait until they find out that Intel's pockets aren't that deep, especially if Intel undergoes major changes to its business during the time the suit plays out.
    Reply
  • Kamen Rider Blade
    So is this the 3rd or 4th Class Action Law-suit?
    Reply
  • DS426
    Kamen Rider Blade said:
    So is this the 3rd or 4th Class Action Law-suit?
    I don't think that can happen (double jeopardy) -- others would have to join the first one that's formally filed, which I believe this is that one. Others were still at the "looking into" stage. Individual cases can also proceed on their own, but then they can't join this one.

    I would expect some companies to be joining in or filing/having filed their own as well.
    Reply
  • magbarn
    Intel already gave me several option for my defective launch 13900K and I took the refund. My brother is getting his 14900K replaced. Not sure why the need for another stupid class action lawsuit. I guess we'll all be happy to get a $5 coupon on our next Arrow Lake CPU while lawyers get millions of dollars.
    Reply
  • halfcharlie
    Imagine being such a fool that they embarrass themselves globally like this. Not only by refusing a replacement which would simply solve everything, but also thinking that a company would willingly lose millions in aforementioned replacements and also suffer industry-wide backlash and lawsuits, rather than simply developing and including the updated micro code from the beginning to avoid the issue if they knew about it. A literal grade schooler has better critical thinking ability. Any sane judge would laugh this out of court, but unfortunately it will be american judges so it's a coin toss on sanity.
    Reply
  • tuan_ngoc_2025
    Sounds like a scam to me. It doesn't look like an individual customer filing a lawsuit, but rather some hungry or greedy lawyer heard about the Intel CPU defect and decided to write the article to get people to join in so they can have a case and hopefully make some money.
    Reply