AMD posts Linux patches to enable RDNA 4 GPUs — could RX 8000-series graphics cards actually arrive in 2024?
AMD's new Linux graphics drivers support IP blocks for the next-generation.
AMD's Radeon RX 8000 may be getting closer. The company's driver team recently rolled out a series of new patches for the AMDGPU Linux kernel graphics driver that enable some of the IP blocks that presumably belong to graphics processors based on the company's next-generation RDNA 4 architecture. For now, these are basic building blocks of a driver, but such step-by-step rollout corresponds to the company's enablement strategy, as observed by Phoronix.
The latest patches enable operation of several critical components: ATHUB has been upgraded to version 4.1, LSDMA to version 7.0, IH to version 7.0, and HDP also to version 7.0. Each of these IP blocks is crucial for operation of a graphics processor (in this case, presumably an RDNA 4-based family).
ATHUB 4.1 is meant to enable clock-gating and power management capabilities to ensure better energy efficiency. LSDMA 7.0 updates are focused on the Light SDMA 7.0, which is essential for the general-purpose System DMA operations within the GPU. Similarly, IH 7.0 brings presumably RDNA 4-related enhancements to the GPU's Interrupt Handler, and HDP 7.0 improves the Host Data Path, which is crucial for enabling CPU access to GPU device memory through the PCIe BAR.
The Linux patches roll out approach taken by AMD involves a component-by-component strategy for updating its open-source Linux graphics driver for new GPU architectures. This method makes it a challenge to directly link the updates of specific IP block versions with future product releases before they are officially announced. The substantial version updates for these IP blocks strongly suggest their association with the RDNA 4 graphics architecture rather than further enhancements to the RDNA 3 series.
Meanwhile, the rollout of the new patches follow AMD's efforts to enable GFX1200 in LLVM for GFX12 GPU hardware (which probably refers to RDNA 4 graphics processors), so indeed it is probably safe to say that AMD's Radeon RX 8000 series, which is set to replace the company's Radeon RX 7000 family of products (some of which are among the best graphics cards) is getting closer.
Timing of these patch series submissions implies that the updates are intended for the Linux 6.9 merge window, which is expected to become a stable release in the middle of the year.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.
-
Makaveli There is suppose to be no high end RDNA 4 gpu just midrange and below.Reply
I want to see if that rumor about them releasing something that gives 7900XTX performance for less power consumption is going to be true. I'm also wondering if card based on RDNA 3.5 for the highend will be released until RDNA 5 is ready.
And will this RDNA 3.5 card be RDNA 3 that was suppose to launch but ran into some hardware issues. -
artk2219
Yep, if they can basically deliver a 7900 XTX with around 1/2 - 2/3 the power consumption at a $6oo ish pricepoint, that should sell pretty well. Well at least to people that aren't vehemently anti AMD or are influenced by people that are, even though they've likely never actually used an AMD card themselves.Makaveli said:There is suppose to be no high end RDNA 4 gpu just midrange and below.
I want to see if that rumor about them releasing something that gives 7900XTX performance for less power consumption is going to be true. I'm also wondering if card based on RDNA 3.5 for the highend will be released until RDNA 5 is ready.
And will this RDNA 3.5 card be RDNA 3 that was suppose to launch but ran into some hardware issues. -
Giroro I want to see AMD put 24GB+ VRAM on a $500 card, specifically to screw with people buying a 4090 for AI. Even if it had 1/3 the performance it would be disruptive, and fun.Reply -
Amdlova If AMD still put old power connector on these new graphics cardReply
will have lots of potential buyers :D -
usertests
Top RDNA4 card might not match 7900 XTX in raster, but maybe raytracing will be a different story. But it should have a much lower price and power consumption.Makaveli said:There is suppose to be no high end RDNA 4 gpu just midrange and below.
I want to see if that rumor about them releasing something that gives 7900XTX performance for less power consumption is going to be true. I'm also wondering if card based on RDNA 3.5 for the highend will be released until RDNA 5 is ready.
And will this RDNA 3.5 card be RDNA 3 that was suppose to launch but ran into some hardware issues.
I don't think we'll see RDNA3.5 outside of the Strix APU family. Maybe Zen 5 desktop I/O die IF they bother updating it.
RDNA4 should have up to 16 GB, but it would be fun to see a 32 GB halo option for AI and extreme VRAM future proofing.Giroro said:I want to see AMD put 24GB+ VRAM on a $500 card, specifically to screw with people buying a 4090 for AI. Even if it had 1/3 the performance it would be disruptive, and fun. -
artk2219
I figure we'll find out soon enough, the last time they took this approach we wound up with the RX 5700 series. The 5700 series was faster than the vega series, cheaper, used 2/3 as much power, and had the same amount of vram. I guess we'll see what it looks like in the coming months. Also can't forget the hd 3000 and 4000 series that were similar in concept.usertests said:Top RDNA4 card might not match 7900 XTX in raster, but maybe raytracing will be a different story. But it should have a much lower price and power consumption.
I don't think we'll see RDNA3.5 outside of the Strix APU family. Maybe Zen 5 desktop I/O die IF they bother updating it.
RDNA4 should have up to 16 GB, but it would be fun to see a 32 GB halo option for AI and extreme VRAM future proofing. -
-Fran- artk2219 said:Yep, if they can basically deliver a 7900 XTX with around 1/2 - 2/3 the power consumption at a $6oo ish pricepoint, that should sell pretty well. Well at least to people that aren't vehemently anti AMD or are influenced by people that are, even though they've likely never actually used an AMD card themselves.
Like that? xD
Regards. -
Colif
From what I have seen that is about right, the RT will be better, and they also going for lower power usage again.usertests said:Top RDNA4 card might not match 7900 XTX in raster, but maybe raytracing will be a different story.
8000 series might not be overly exciting but who knows. 9000 series looks more promising.