Corsair expects Nvidia's RTX 50 series will retain the 12V-2x6 power connector — Next-Gen GPUs could consume well over 450W of power
However, there is no word on what connectors AMD or Intel will use.
Nvidia's RTX 50 "Blackwell" GPUs are on the horizon and should be the only offering in the high-end "enthusiast-level" segment. A Press Release from Corsair reports that next-generation high-end GPUs (from Nvidia) will likely retain the updated 12V-2x6 standard, sticking to a single 16-pin connector design and could require more power.
Based on leaked information, Nvidia's flagship RTX 5090 is said to consume almost 600W of power — up from the RTX 4090's 450W TDP. This still isn't ample to saturate the 12V-2x6 design, which can theoretically provide 675W of power (H++). Without a doubt, AIBs will release high-end variants with dual 16-pin connectors but that's the exception, not the rule.
Corsair states that it expects flagship GPUs (from Nvidia) to continue with the 12V-2x6 design. While the company doesn't explicitly say so, there's a slight hint that the RTX 50 series might draw more power than the current generation. Corsair urges users to upgrade their existing PSUs to accommodate this potential uptick in power requirements.
AMD and Intel might not entertain the idea of changing standards - since both will not compete with Nvidia in the high-end market. Then we have the obvious problems with the 12VHPWR design - which were addressed with the 12V-2x6 update. However, the standard is still a novelty for mainstream consumers as traditional 8-pin connectors will suffice for this segment. In addition, budget PSUs still lack 16-pin connectors hence the introduction of a new standard will impede adoption which is why the idea will likely be dismissed.
Nvidia and AMD should announce their upcoming RTX 50 "Blackwell" and Radeon RX 8000 "RDNA 4" GPUs at CES 2025. Team Blue enthusiasts might be in for a surprise since rumor has it that Intel is planning to announce Xe2 "Battlemage" GPUs for desktop next month - though it is unclear when they will be available to purchase.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Hassam Nasir is a die-hard hardware enthusiast with years of experience as a tech editor and writer, focusing on detailed CPU comparisons and general hardware news. When he’s not working, you’ll find him bending tubes for his ever-evolving custom water-loop gaming rig or benchmarking the latest CPUs and GPUs just for fun.
-
chaz_music They really need to think about raising the voltage in that interface to drop the current down from what is needed at 12V. Unfortunately, UL does not consider anything above 30V as touch safe. So ~28VDC? That drops the current down to 43% for the same power level, or 16A for a 450W load.Reply
But the fact that we have these connectors burning up at this power level and no homes have been burned down (yet) indicates that UL has done a great job choosing the best insulation material to prevent fires, rated 94V0 (typically Nylon). If those connector shells had been made of something cheaper like PVC or ABS, it would be a different story. -
Eximo chaz_music said:They really need to think about raising the voltage in that interface to drop the current down from what is needed at 12V. Unfortunately, UL does not consider anything above 30V as touch safe. So ~28VDC? That drops the current down to 43% for the same power level, or 16A for a 450W load.
But the fact that we have these connectors burning up at this power level and no homes have been burned down (yet) indicates that UL has done a great job choosing the best insulation material to prevent fires, rated 94V0 (typically Nylon). If those connector shells had been made of something cheaper like PVC or ABS, it would be a different story.
I'm all for a 24V PSU or the like, but that would be a radical change to ATX and require a pretty harsh changeover. You think adapter cables are bad, wait until it has a 12V to 24V boost converter inside of it. -
hotaru251 AMD ditching high end and focusing on mid and entry means they will likely use 8pin as its tried & true & no need for a (likely) more expensive connector.Reply -
YSCCC with the 12V 2x6 it should be fine for most, but I do think the placement of the connector will need to be thought over more carefully, the old 8pin is "safe" coz it carries much lower power per pin so even partially unseating it wouldn't be a problem, and that the cable itself is soft enough to bend pretty tightly for cable management in smaller cases. if the 4090s back then wasn't that large (tall) to esseitially force one to bend it tightly with a small footprint connector, it likely won't have as big a drama unfoldingReply -
setx
It's safe due to completely different reason: it's overprovisioned by at least 2x, maybe even 3x.YSCCC said:the old 8pin is "safe" coz it carries much lower power per pin
Personally, I think using old proven-good connectors is competitive advantage. I would definitely buy a card with 4x 8-pin connectors (or even 6x) over card with 1 new dangerous one. -
Eximo Or EPS, like they do in servers. It was the obvious solution aside from the whole 8-pin confusion problem (which exists anyway)Reply -
Sluggotg If we are looking at 600 watts for the 50 series, it would be irresponsible to use a single 675 watt connection. Using 89% of max rated capacity is never a good idea. Two connectors would be great. I do agree they need to look at a different angle for the power connector on those video cards. (Of course the case and how the card are mounted dictate the best connector angle).Reply -
aberkae
Hopefully it's tdp heatsinks at peak oc performance for reference model and not actual real world power draw.P.Amini said:What is good? 600W power draw?!