SSD overclocking yields big performance gains — overclocked SSD controller and NAND may lead to premature degradation or data loss, though

SATA SSD overclocked to perform at maximum specification
(Image credit: Gabriel Ferraz - Detetive Virtual de SSDs)

How can you make the best SSDs even better? Overclocking it, of course. Suppose you ever wonder what kind of performance you can expect from an overclocked SSD. In that case, Youtuber Gabriel Ferraz documents the whole process with adequate details to show this process and the performance one could achieve.

Ferraz is doing it out of curiosity, like any hardware enthusiast would, achieving some results with certain limitations and restrictions. The video is interesting as it shows the selection process of the suitable SSD for the job and its result.

Roshan Ashraf Shaikh
Contributing Writer

Roshan Ashraf Shaikh has been in the Indian PC hardware community since the early 2000s and has been building PCs, contributing to many Indian tech forums, & blogs. He operated Hardware BBQ for 11 years and wrote news for eTeknix & TweakTown before joining Tom's Hardware team. Besides tech, he is interested in fighting games, movies, anime, and mechanical watches.

  • vanadiel007
    Imagine if they would have stuck for the 2.5" form factor for drives? Cooling would not be an issue, speeds could have been higher than current M2.

    But, they had to go to tightly packed M2 directly connected to the motherboard. Now they have issues cooling it and are coming out with all kind of contraptions to cool them down. Who would have thought.
    Reply
  • Vanderlindemedia
    He killed the drive, at the end of the video. With just that small clock increase, the flash chips gave up.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    vanadiel007 said:
    Imagine if they would have stuck for the 2.5" form factor for drives? Cooling would not be an issue, speeds could have been higher than current M2.
    U.2 & U.3 drives are 2.5" and can indeed dissipate much more power than M.2 drives. The highest I've seen was an Optane SSD which burned over 20 W, at peak.

    vanadiel007 said:
    But, they had to go to tightly packed M2 directly connected to the motherboard. Now they have issues cooling it and are coming out with all kind of contraptions to cool them down. Who would have thought.
    Yup. M.2 was a form factor clearly made by people thinking first & foremost about the laptop market. I wish U.2 would have a resurgence in the enthusiast community, but if PCIe 5.0 wasn't enough to make that happen, we shouldn't hold out further hope.

    You can still get datacenter U.2 drives for somewhat accessible prices, although not as good as most of 2023. I got one of these for $311, but now it's up to $517. I saw it go as low as $276, right after I place my order!
    https://www.provantage.com/solidigm-ssdpf2kx038t1n1~7SLDG02U.htm
    You can find plenty of reviews out there, but I've never seen anyone run gaming benchmarks on them. I think they should be good on latency-intensive games, like Starfield. Also, you can buy them in much higher capacities than consumer drives.
    Reply
  • JarredWaltonGPU
    bit_user said:
    U.2 & U.3 drives are 2.5" and can indeed dissipate much more power than M.2 drives. The highest I've seen was an Optane SSD which burned over 20 W, at peak.


    Yup. M.2 was a form factor clearly made by people thinking first & foremost about the laptop market. I wish U.2 would have a resurgence in the enthusiast community, but if PCIe 5.0 wasn't enough to make that happen, we shouldn't hold out further hope.

    You can still get datacenter U.2 drives for somewhat accessible prices, although not as good as most of 2023. I got one of these for $311, but now it's up to $517. I saw it go as low as $276, right after I place my order!
    https://www.provantage.com/solidigm-ssdpf2kx038t1n1~7SLDG02U.htm
    You can find plenty of reviews out there, but I've never seen anyone run gaming benchmarks on them. I think they should be good on latency-intensive games, like Starfield. Also, you can buy them in much higher capacities than consumer drives.
    Worth noting is that M.2 has an average power limit of ~12W (something like that), while U.2 has a limit of 25W. I don't mind the form factor, though, as it cleans up most builds. Stuffing in a U.2 drive means running two more cables to the front of the case. I was quite happy to stop putting optical drives and HDDs into my builds back in... maybe 2015.
    Reply
  • richardvday
    JarredWaltonGPU said:
    Worth noting is that M.2 has an average power limit of ~12W (something like that), while U.2 has a limit of 25W. I don't mind the form factor, though, as it cleans up most builds. Stuffing in a U.2 drive means running two more cables to the front of the case. I was quite happy to stop putting optical drives and HDDs into my builds back in... maybe 2015.
    The M2 form factor is here because its simpler, for most people(we are not their target audience ) one drive is plenty. Simpler means Cheaper, more convenient. As far as cooling goes its just like CPUs , we didn't need fans at first that didn't come until later when the performance forced more heat into our cases. Back in the day the only fan most of us had was in the PSU. Now I have 7 fans not counting my CPU cooler or my GPU so actually I have 11 fans. So now performance has drastically increased so more heat means we need more fans. Par for the course.
    I miss having my burner in the computer actually. Its much more expensive to replace the external drives. Also desktop space is always at a premium. I am not at all surprised about this efforts results. Nowadays manufacturers tend to overclock at the factory pretty much leaving very little performance to be had by the end users. There are still some golden eggs to be had good luck finding one though, the silicone lottery is real. I dont even bother overclocking anymore the gains tend to not be worth the effort.
    Reply
  • Kamen Rider Blade
    JarredWaltonGPU said:
    Worth noting is that M.2 has an average power limit of ~12W (something like that), while U.2 has a limit of 25W. I don't mind the form factor, though, as it cleans up most builds. Stuffing in a U.2 drive means running two more cables to the front of the case. I was quite happy to stop putting optical drives and HDDs into my builds back in... maybe 2015.
    I'm a big fan of Multi-Drive Storage Backplanes inserted into standard 5¼" or 3½" drive bays myself.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    JarredWaltonGPU said:
    Stuffing in a U.2 drive means running two more cables to the front of the case.
    My cases still have 2.5"/3.5" bays right behind the intake fans, which is perfect for U.2 drives. None of this nonsense with ginormous, gaudy heatsinks on M.2 drives installed awkwardly on the mobo, and in a spot that might not have good airflow (thereby necessitating an active cooler),

    JarredWaltonGPU said:
    I was quite happy to stop putting optical drives and HDDs into my builds back in... maybe 2015.
    I still have optical drives in mine, so there!: P
    Reply
  • bit_user
    richardvday said:
    Back in the day the only fan most of us had was in the PSU. Now I have 7 fans not counting my CPU cooler or my GPU so actually I have 11 fans.
    Ironically, fanless PSUs are actually getting more common, leaving the PSU as one of the few places we actually lost a fan!

    BTW, I have a special love for fanless mini-PCs. I have a fanless Gemini Lake Refresh that I'm likely to replace with Alder Lake N97, at some point. It's not my main PC, but rather an always-on media server.
    Reply
  • Amdlova
    JarredWaltonGPU said:
    Worth noting is that M.2 has an average power limit of ~12W (something like that), while U.2 has a limit of 25W. I don't mind the form factor, though, as it cleans up most builds. Stuffing in a U.2 drive means running two more cables to the front of the case. I was quite happy to stop putting optical drives and HDDs into my builds back in... maybe 2015.
    12w of powa in PC... some notebook manufacturers recommend using maximum 2tb... because don't have the minimum specs of the m.2 standard.
    Reply
  • kaalus
    What's the point? My Windows 11 can delete maybe 100 or 200 files per second on my 990Pro, which according to spec can do 1.5million IOPS. So it would seem, it takes 15,000 I/O operations to delete a single file in NTFS? That's crazy inoptimal. Even in a journalled filesystem it should not take more than 2 or 3.

    So, don't overclock your SSDs - optimize NTFS, or ditch Windows.
    Reply