History Of Mechanical Keyboards

Quotron 855

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
TOPICS
  • nutjob2
    "The touchpad is a capacitive touchscreen, although it was designed in the 1980s."

    One end of this sentence contradicts the other end.
    Reply
  • adamovera
    18764445 said:
    "The touchpad is a capacitive touchscreen, although it was designed in the 1980s."
    One end of this sentence contradicts the other end.
    Good catch, it's not a "screen" at all.
    Reply
  • Rip Ripster
    Congrats! You have been featured at /r/MechanicalKeyboards:

    https://www.reddit.com/r/MechanicalKeyboards/comments/58v23g/history_of_mechanical_keyboards/
    Reply
  • dudmont
    I went screaming through the list looking for the model M, alas, you missed out on the best keyboard ever made. Doh!
    Reply
  • Parak
    The Model M is just a cheapened Model F mechanism which is mentioned in the article - as such, I'd argue that it's not as interesting or historically important in comparison.
    Reply
  • JohnnyLucky
    WOW!

    I purchased my very first computer In December 1984 at an IBM retail store in Atlanta, Georgia. It is 32 years later and I still use the same keyboard every day. The keyboard layout was identical to the IBM Model D Selectric typewriter. The Model D Selectric was the word's all time best selling typewriter. By copying the keyboard layout IBM made it easy to transition from typewriter to keyboard.

    When I bought the pc I chose the space saver version of the keyboard. There is no numeric pad. I thought I would not need it. I was right. The keyboard is a real beast. It weighs 8.5 pounds, is waterproof, and heavily shielded. The letters and symbols on the keys are not silk screened like the cheap keyboards. Instead, the keys have an inner black shell and an outer beige shell. Letters and symbols are laser cut on the beige outer shell exposing the black inner shell. The letters and symbols will never fade away. When typing there is a distinct metallic clicking sound. I wouldn't trade it for anything.

    32 YEARS AND STILL WORKING!

    50 YEARS OR BUST!
    Reply
  • JohnMD1022
    My 1986 Model M also works perfectly.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    I was glad to see Maltron and the Datahand.

    I've been using Kinesis contoured keyboards for years. The physical layout is probably among the best. Although their height usually requires the use of a keyboard tray. My chief complaints are that the PS2 version has issues missing key strokes/releases (maybe about 0.1%) and the ESC key is garbage. Also, sometimes the keyboard thinks one of the modifier keys (Shift or Alt) is being held down. And I've had 3 different units, so it's not just a bad one. That I've put up with these quirks for over 10 years is a testament to just how much I like the layout.

    I briefly used a foot switch for it. But, once I got out of the habit, I found it difficult to resume using.

    I've been meaning to upgrade to the USB-enabled Advantage. It looks like they have the same ESC key, but hopefully the electronics have been improved.

    https://www.kinesis-ergo.com/shop/advantage2/

    If anyone can recommend something similar, I'm receptive to suggestions. I simply cannot believe Maltrons are still so expensive. Just as the Kinesis contoured keyboards have always seemed to be around $300, Maltrons have always seemed to be north of $750.

    Update: Just noticed the Advantage2 upgraded the function keys (and presumably ESC).
    Cherry ML mechanical function keysLong-time Advantage users will rejoice to learn that we’ve replaced the mushy, rubber function keys with high-performance Cherry ML switches that offer the same low-force and tactile properties of the MX Brown.
    I guess it's finally time for me to upgrade.
    Reply
  • AndrewLekashman
    Excellent point @nutjob2! That line is an artifact from a previous round of editing, and the word touchscreen doesn't belong in the sentence.
    Reply
  • laststop311
    cherry mx switches are good enough nowadays. no need for these crazy expensive weird mechanical designs.
    Reply