Tom's Hardware Verdict
While a $10 price difference might not be enough to sway most enthusiast, it’s enough to put the Strix B360-G Gaming in a lackluster value position. Your choice will more likely involve counting ports and other connectors, as it should.
Pros
- +
Good Performance
- +
Good Layout
- +
Good Features
- +
High-end audio codec
Cons
- -
Lower Efficiency
- -
Higher Price
Why you can trust Tom's Hardware
Features & Layout
The Strix B360-G Gaming shares little if anything in design with its Z370 sibling. That may be due to the integrated USB 3.1 Gen2 support of the newer H370 and B360 chipsets, which no longer require the board to have a spot for an additional controller integrated circuit (IC), yet we’ve seen other manufacturers at least share circuit boards between various models and exclude built-in features via the transition. Asus wasn’t having any of that in this ROG-series board, though.
Specifications
Socket | LGA 1151 |
Chipset | Intel B360 |
Form Factor | Micro ATX |
Voltage Regulator | 6 Phases |
Video Ports | DVI-D, HDMI 1.4b |
USB Ports | 10Gbps: (2) Type A 5Gb/s: (2) Type A; (2) USB 2.0 |
Network Jacks | Gigabit Ethernet |
Audio Jacks | (5) Analog, (1) Digital Out |
Legacy Ports/Jacks | (1) PS/2 |
Other Ports/Jack | ✗ |
PCIe x16 | (2) v3.0 (x16/x4*) (*Shares upper PCIe x1) |
PCIe x8 | ✗ |
PCIe x4 | ✗ |
PCIe x1 | (2) v3.0 (Upper x1 shared w/4-lane x16 slot) |
CrossFire/SLI | 2x / ✗ |
DIMM slots | (4) DDR4 |
M.2 slots | (1) PCIe 3.0 x4 /, (1) PCIe 3.0 x2 / SATA |
U.2 Ports | ✗ |
SATA Ports | (6) 6Gb/s |
USB Headers | (1) v3.0, (2) v2.0 |
Fan Headers | (4) 4-Pin |
Legacy Interfaces | Serial COM Port |
Other Interfaces | FP-Audio, RGB-LED, TPM |
Diagnostics Panel | ✗ |
Internal Button/Switch | ✗ / ✗ |
SATA Controllers | Integrated |
Ethernet Controllers | WGI219V PHY |
Wi-Fi / Bluetooth | ✗ / ✗ |
USB Controllers | Integrated |
HD Audio Codec | ALC1220 |
DDL/DTS Connect | ✗ |
Warranty | 3 Years |
Features & Layout
The Strix B360-G loses only six of the parent (Z370) chipset’s 30 HSIO lanes, but it only allows 12 of the remaining 24 lanes to be directed to PCIe. That needn’t be a problem for any Micro ATX board, since the CPU’s separate PCIe controller feeds the graphics card. We count four lanes for its bottom x16-length PCIe slot, one more lane for the lower PCIe x1 slots, four lanes for the primary M.2 adapter, and two lanes for the secondary M.2 adapter. Activating the upper x1 slot requires kicking the four-lane bottom slot down to x2 mode, but we can’t imagine any gamers using the x1 slot that’s normally covered by the cooler of their graphics card.
USB 2.0 doesn’t require HSIO access, but is still useful for keyboards and mice, so Asus includes two of those on the rear I/O panel, along with a PS/2 port for people who prefer true legacy peripherals. The two USB 3.1 Gen1 (aka USB 3.0) and two USB 3.1 Gen2 (10Gb/s) ports each get one HSIO, and the Intel network circuitry also requires an HSIO, which brings the I/O panel to five of the remaining 13 available HSIO resources. And the rest of the panel is filled out with DVI-D and HDMI 1.4b for the CPU’s integrated GPU, along with five analog stereo jacks and a digital optical S/PDIF output.
Internally we find six SATA ports and a two-port USB 3.0 header consuming the remaining eight HSIO lanes. So far, the only snag we’ve found is that sharing between the upper PCIe x1 slot and four-lane x16-length bottom slot isn’t documented, either within the manual or on the Strix B360-G Gaming’s web page.
The upper PCIe x16 slot has reinforcement pins at its corners to help prevent a graphics card from tearing the slot from the motherboard during rough handling of the finished build, but the lower x16-length slot doesn’t. The lower slot’s position would require a five-slot case for the builder to install a graphics card with a double-slot cooler, but since it has only four pathways, most builders probably won’t be putting a heavy graphics card there anyway. So the “Crossfire” notion is more theoretical than practical.
Should you choose to put a dual-slot card in the bottom slot anyway, you’ll be happy to see that Asus moved the USB 3.0 internal header up the front edge of the board to place it above the top card, where the stiff cable can’t interfere with anything mounted onto the board. The four perpendicular-facing SATA ports are above that for similar consideration, and the bottom two SATA ports face forward to tuck those cables under the leading edge of any installed cards.
The lower edge features front-panel audio, an RGB LED strip, a 9-pin Serial port, TPM headers, two dual-port USB 2.0 headers, one fan header, and front-panel button/LED headers. Asus has adopted the Intel (circa 1999) nine-pin front-panel connector layout, adding 3-pin-spacing power LED and legacy beep code speaker pins to the right of that standard nine-pin grouping. While the Strix B360-G Gaming supports external RGB strips, its only onboard accent lighting is a row of red LEDs behind a translucent path between the ALC1220 audio codec and I/O panel connectors.
Integrating the I/O shield onto the I/O panel leaves Asus even fewer components for the Strix B360-G Gaming’s installation kit. You get two SATA cables, a pack of cable ties, and M.2 mounting screws. That's it for in-box hardware accessories, but buyers also get a full printed manual, driver and application disc, sticker pack, and a souvenir door card.
MORE: Best Motherboards
MORE: How To Choose A Motherboard
MORE: All Motherboard Content
30-year-old Pentium FDIV bug tracked down in the silicon — Ken Shirriff takes the microscope to Intel's first-ever recall
Cyberpunk 2077 update 2.2 claims to improve Arrow Lake performance by up to 33%, theoretically matching the Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Empyrean Technology gives control to CEC after U.S. blacklisting — China’s top developer of chip design systems hands reins to state-owned firm
-
ryanrmora whAt mArcus implied i didn't know thAt A stAy At home mom Able to get pAid $4252 in 4 weeks on the computer. hAve you reAd this web link www.jobsish.comReply -
AdrianPCS La estética de esta placa base al final queda oculta por la gráfica, ventiladores, nvme y enfriamiento de la cpu, y si el cristal y el acrílico es polarizado aún más, por que la estética no debe ser un factor para elegir esta tarjeta. Para rendimiento y demás cosas, esta el análisis que aqui se hizo.Reply -
AdrianPCS La estética de esta placa base al final queda oculta por la gráfica, ventiladores, nvme y enfriamiento de la cpu, y si el cristal y el acrílico es polarizado aún más, por la estética no debe ser un factor para elegir esta tarjeta. Para el rendimiento y las demás cosas, este es el análisis que aquí se hizo. Joder van tres veces que corrijo mi comentario y me cambia las palabras haciéndolo un sin sentido. que mierda de corrector tienen esto.Reply