Corsair Force MP510 SSD Review: A Force to Be Reckoned With

Tom's Hardware Verdict

The Corsair Force MP510 offers more value than its predecessor along with better endurance ratings than other consumer flash-based SSDs. That, plus nearly class-leading sequential performance and a five-year warranty, make Corsair’s MP510 a Force to be reckoned with.

Pros

  • +

    Great sequential performance

  • +

    Class-leading endurance ratings

  • +

    Good power efficiency

  • +

    Black PCB

  • +

    Affordable

Cons

  • -

    Lower-than-average application performance

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

The Force is strong with this one

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Sean Webster
Storage Reviewer

Sean is a Contributing Editor at Tom’s Hardware US, covering storage hardware.

  • rantoc
    Imo random r/w (80/20) - Low QD is usually the best for the general desktop user
    Reply
  • enzoozzytiger
    Are you sure you get the correct numbers? You list random read at 610,000 IOPS (QD1). Is this for 512 or 4K? Even if it's for 512, it will be the fastest NAND SSD. If it's for 4K, then it even blow the fastest Optane out of the water.
    Reply
  • DogHam
    Sean gives the the MP510 a 4/5, but in my google search results, it shows 4/10 with 2/5 stars filled in. Is there a way for Tom's Hardware to address that? It's a pretty major difference.
    Reply
  • Hupiscratch
    Those Samsung 970's steady state workload tests are quite different from that ssd review. Finally the drivers caught up?
    Reply
  • islandwalker
    @DOGHAM we are aware of this and are trying to address, but it's a development issue, not something editorial can control.
    Reply
  • saunupe1911
    Sounds like the HP EX920 has it beat as well
    Reply
  • jimmysmitty
    21407990 said:
    Sean gives the the MP510 a 4/5, but in my google search results, it shows 4/10 with 2/5 stars filled in. Is there a way for Tom's Hardware to address that? It's a pretty major difference.

    I think its either an issue with how Google is pulling the review or the way TH presents it as even Guru3D gave it a pretty stellar score.
    Reply