AMD FX: Energy Efficiency Compared To Eight Other CPUs
We've already seen AMD's Bulldozer architecture come up short in the performance benchmarks. However, the company also claims it made important improvements to power consumption. Can FX-8150 at least score some points in the energy efficiency department?
Single-Threaded Efficiency
AMD’s FX-8150 earns bad marks in applications that are not thread-optimized. Due to an ugly step backward in performance per clock cycle, the Bulldozer-based processor comes in last place.
Average power consumption is nothing to write home about, either.
Finally, we measure total power consumed during the test run of single-threaded applications. AMD uses about 40% more power, measured in watt-hours, than a comparable Intel system with a discrete graphics card.
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Current page: Single-Threaded Efficiency
Prev Page Power Consumption: Idle/Load Next Page Multi-Threaded Efficiency
Patrick Schmid was the editor-in-chief for Tom's Hardware from 2005 to 2006. He wrote numerous articles on a wide range of hardware topics, including storage, CPUs, and system builds.