GeForce GTX 460M SLI: Mobile Gaming Value From AVADirect?
Nvidia’s GeForce GTX 480M may hold the mobile performance crown, but GF100 is certainly not the most practical solution when it comes to power and heat. Today we see how its newer, smaller sibling stands up to the same tasks, aided by SLI support.
Nvidia's GeForce GTX 460M
With a die size less than half that of the GeForce GTX 480M, the GTX 460M’s 1.5 GB memory configuration could leave some users confused about its origins. A little poking around with GPU-Z helps shed some light on the internals.
Like the mobile parts that came before it, Nvidia sources its GTX 460M GPU from the desktop lineup, in this case the now-familiar GF106 previously found on the GeForce GTS 450. But how did the desktop card end up with 1.0 GB memory if capacities are limited to bus width multiplied by exponents of two?
Desktop vs Mobile GeForce Graphics | |||
---|---|---|---|
Row 0 - Cell 0 | Desktop GeForce GTX 460 | Desktop GeForce GTS 450 | GeForce GTX 460M |
Transistors | 1.95 billion | 1.17 billion | 1.17 billion |
Engine Clock | 675 MHz | 783 MHz | 675 MHz |
Stream Processors | 336 | 192 | 192 |
Texture Units | 56 | 32 | 32 |
ROP Units | 32 | 16 | 24 |
Compute Performance | 907 GFLOPS | 601 GFLOPS | 518 GFLOPS |
DRAM Type | 1.0 GB GDDR5-3600 | 1.0 GB GDDR5-3206 | 1.5 GB GDDR5-2500 |
DRAM Interface | 256-bits | 128-bits | 192-bits |
Memory Bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 57.7 GB/s | 60.0 GB/s |
Module TDP | 160W | 106W | 65W |
The desktop GeForce GTS 450 has been handicapped by Nvidia, in spite of what we were told at launch. The back-end was formerly limited to 16 ROP units and a 128-bit interface. The memory capacity difference now makes sense, because 128 x 8 equals 1024, and 192 x 8 equals 1536.
The added ROP units make it appear as though the GeForce GTX 460M might be a little more powerful than the desktop GeForce GTS 450, but a lower clock speed on an identical number of stream processors more than makes up the difference. The GTX 460M ends up short of the GTS 450, in spite of its extra bandwidth. But that’s probably fine with Nvidia since the desktop part often performs on par with the super-expensive GeForce GTX 480M.
Aside from what appears to be a huge performance deficit compared to the desktop GeForce GTX 460, the best reference point for GTX 460M performance could be the GTX 480M. With twice the memory bandwidth and twice the die size, Nvidia's GTX 480M undoubtedly costs more to manufacture than the GTX 460M. We checked the prices of two major vendors to find out how much a single-card to dual-card upgrade costs, in an effort to determine the cost-per-card built into each notebook.
Mobile Graphics Module Prices (Upgrade from Single to Dual GPU) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Row 0 - Cell 0 | GeForce GTX 480M | Mobility Radeon HD 5870 | GeForce GTX 460M |
Die Size | 529 mm² | 170 mm² | 238 mm² |
Memory | 2 GB GDDR5-2400 | 1 GB GDDR5-4000 | 1.5 GB GDDR5-2500 |
Module Price | $588 | $382 | $213 |
Before we even begin testing, the smaller part looks like it could provide a huge value benefit. The GeForce GTX 460M costs less than half the price of a GTX 480M, though higher yields on the smaller part could potentially account for the difference.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Current page: Nvidia's GeForce GTX 460M
Prev Page A Little More “Less Is More” Next Page AVADirect’s X7200-
silversurfernhs last gaming laptop i'll ever own was the HDX20 8800m series... google it - thats why. It lasted me a few generations - and the wifey uses it now, still games well(for the games she plays anyway).Reply
All these "gaming" laptops are on 17" screens... i'd just as well plug it into an external monitor - which defeats the purpose a bit - might as well have a small fragbox for the price...
I wish some company would rejuvinate the spirit of HP's HDX Dragon line... -
nebun it's so funny that the mid range sli setup destroys the top of the like ati crossfire setup, lol. nvidia for life..Reply -
Maziar Thanks for the article;however,I hoped you compare it with 2 GTX 480Ms as wellReply
BTW,you can find this laptop(with the same config as the review) much cheaper from other sites such as XoticPC.(Starts from $2100)
http://www.xoticpc.com/sager-np7280-custom-laptop-built-the-clevo-x7200-p-2881.html -
jomofro39 True value will hit when the cpus with the integrated graphics come out, hopefully. That is their purpose, right? I hardly find 3,100 or 2,100 dollars a value. Gaming on the go is a privilege, not a need. Value on a privilege needs to be steeper than this.Reply -
Crashman MaziarThanks for the article;however,I hoped you compare it with 2 GTX 480Ms as wellYes, well, the X8100 didn't support two of them due to power issues (most HUGE notebooks won't) and the other X7200 (the one with the 980X installed) had already been sent back.Reply
-
theholylancer soo umm i7 950 DESKTOP vs i7 920 XM MOBILE?Reply
did someone forgot to mention that the AMD cards were paired with mobile procs, while 460Ms got the destkop stuff?
It did not made any sense when I saw that crysis high AMD gets slaughtered, and then V High is evenish. Then I looked back and saw that AMD gets a mobile CPU that could have been the bottleneck given the gfx power...