Gigabyte X670E Aorus Master Review: Fully Equipped, Under $500

Dual PCIe 5.0 M.2 socket and plenty of USB ports.

Gigabyte X670E Aorus Master
(Image credit: © Tom's Hardware)

Tom's Hardware Verdict

Gigabyte’s X670E Aorus Master is a well-equipped, capable and power-efficient motherboard for $499.99. You get two PCIe 5.0 M.2 sockets, 12 rear USB ports and robust power delivery. So long as you don’t need 40 Gbps USB and the latest and greatest audio codec, it’s a great sub-$500 option for Zen 4.

Reasons to buy

  • +

    12 USB ports on Rear IO

  • +

    2x PCIe 5.0 M2 sockets

  • +

    M.2 + PCIe EZ-Latches

  • +

    Low power use

Reasons to avoid

  • -

    Lacks USB 4 (40 Gbps) ports

  • -

    Last-gen audio codec

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

The Gigabyte Aorus Master hit store shelves upon release for $499.99, which places it in the upper mid-range price bracket in today's world of absurdly expensive board options. For that price, you get a well-equipped board with two PCIe 5.0 M.2 sockets, capable power delivery, above-average listed memory support among like-priced peers, a high-quality audio solution and a premium neutral appearance that’s sure to look good inside your chassis along with your new Zen 4 processor and hardware.

Gigabyte’s current X670E lineup consists of four motherboards. Starting at the top is the current flagship X670E Aorus Extreme ($699.99), followed by the Aorus Master, X670 Aorus Elite AX ($289.99), and X670 Gaming X AX (not listed as of this writing, but should be less than the Aorus Master). There aren’t a lot of options with this chipset at this time. However, if you’re open to what B650E has to offer, Gigabyte has 13 options in all shapes and sizes. There you’ll also find the Aero board for Creators and small MiniITX and MicroATX form factors. I’d imagine we’ll see a couple of new X670/E boards as time goes on, and I hope the Halo-class Aorus Extreme Waterforce is one of them.

Joe Shields
Staff Writer, Components

Joe Shields is a staff writer at Tom’s Hardware. He reviews motherboards and PC components.

  • tummybunny
    Nice review. The B650E version of this is far better value for most users.
    Reply
  • waltc3
    As the owner of an AM4 Aorus Master, I have to say I was very disappointed by this AM5 Aorus Master. Very disappointed. Here are a few things I've noticed when perusing the Gigabyte site and looking at the feature set. (Please let me know if I've missed something here...!)

    1) No backpanel Clear CMOS button--gone! I've used it a lot on the x570 Master. Why would GB think that people might actually prefer opening up the case and setting a jumper for every Clear CMOS? Huge step backwards.

    2) Dual bios, mechanically switched, on the AM4 Master--Gone in the AM5 Master. That was a compelling feature for me.

    3) The AM5 Master has the same audio codec as the AM4 Master--but GB has removed the hardware SABRE DAC, along with the hardware headphone amp. Result is inferior headphone sound compared to the AM4 Master, by a healthy margin.

    4) The AM5 Master loses a Lan port, but gains an extra .M2 slot, compared to the AM4 Master. That's a wash, or maybe better than the AM4, depending on your point of view.

    5) Last but not least, the AM4 Master is an ATX mboard while the AM5 Master is an E-ATX, so I'd need a new case for it on top of everything else.

    There are a few more obvious deficiencies when compared to the AM4 Master, but those are the main ones that I recall. The Kicker? To get the feature set I love about the AM4 Master, I would have to swing for the $800 Aorus Xtreme! That's really pathetic Gigabyte.

    It all makes sticking with AM4 a bit longer a much more attractive proposition...;)
    Reply
  • ohio_buckeye
    500 bucks seem obscene imo. Obviously I'm not the target market for this board, but I have no intention of spending as much on the board as the cpu.
    Reply
  • HideOut
    Giving any board a 4 star rating thats $500 is rediculous. This is more exensive than all but ONE CPU that goes in it. And outdated audio codec? Thats just sad on a flagship class board.
    Reply
  • ohio_buckeye
    To be honest a little disappointed with amd over the am5 launch as a whole. This is from someone who has owned amd products since the late 90s. Just seems with am5, the prices on ram and boards has made their products expensive effectively, at a time when the economy is on a downturn.

    Was not aware that the board referenced is using outdated audio. For 500 that board should be the newest and the best you can buy or close to it.

    This isn’t related directly to this board but they really need to get a620 boards and cheaper b650 boards, cheaper ddr5, and a few non x cpus. One cpu that would have been an incredible value would have been a 7600x3d. From what I read earlier there isn’t one planned. These companies are trying to survive and I get that, but on a flagship board using outdated tech comes across as greedy.
    Reply