Kingston HyperX Savage 240GB SSD Review

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.


The SATA-based SSD market is so saturated with good drives that it's nearly impossible for a mediocre offering to earn a recommendation. When the product's price is as high as Kingston's HyperX Savage (240GB for $150), it had better be impeccable or risk falling below Samsung's 850 Pro (256GB for $162), SanDisk Extreme Pro (240GB for $160) or Samsung 850 EVO (250GB for $130). Before we get into that, let's look at what Kingston does right with its HyperX Savage. 

There is no denying that Kingston is diluting the stature of the HyperX brand. Once an indicator of the computer industry's best components, Newegg now shows over 500 hits in a search for 'HyperX'. The HyperX Fury really sealed the deal for me; Kingston's enthusiast moniker went from premium to sub-par in one blister pack. The HyperX Savage gives us a rebirth of the extravagant retail box and accessory package. Opening it up, the quality is apparent, you see everything needed to install the drive and you know that this is a special product.

The Savage delivers class-leading sequential read and write performance. In both categories, this is the fastest SATA-attached device on the market. Of course, most of us move large files on a fairly regular basis, but those sequential transfers typically go to secondary drives; I'm not sure that many enthusiasts are purchasing new premium-priced SSDs for this task.  

At its weakest point, the HyperX Savage 240GB is unacceptable. Mixed random performance using 80% reads at 20,000 IOPS is the worst we've seen from a modern SSD. Most of us will never get beyond a queue depth of eight, but at QD4 the damage is already done. Sequential mixed workload performance isn't much better. Again, the Savage 240GB is at the bottom of our charts, lower than SSDs costing significantly less. One-hundred percent random reads and writes are not as bad, but we don't just read or write data with a boot drive. If adding just a little mix degrades performance this much, then you might as well purchase a value-priced drive and save some money.

We're frankly surprised that Kingston, Patriot and Corsair have already released products with the Phison S10 controller. We've heard it's an expensive processor. Maybe those companies managed to secure a lower price until Phison readies its performance-enhancing firmware. After all, the trio lacks firmware engineers of their own. Aside from Samsung, all of the top-performing SSDs use Marvell controllers. Marvell doesn't provide retail-ready firmware to its partners; you need a team to put the pieces together. Kingston just released the HyperX Predator PCIe-based SSD with Marvell logic, but its Savage doesn't employ a Marvell processor. We can assume that Kingston either put together a firmware team or paid a high price to release the 88SS9293 controller first and got firmware with it.

Kingston, Patriot and Corsair know a higher-performance firmware is on the way, but chose to launch S10-based products before the magic sauce was ready anyway. We have a good idea why: all three companies had most of their eggs in the SandForce basket. Now they've jumped over to Phison. The HyperX family was always built around SandForce (even the HyperX Predator was shown with SF3700 at CES). Might that ship have sunk?

It's a good guess, though that fails to address the fact that today's S10-based drives are not worth their high prices. When Phison releases its impending firmware update, my opinion may change. But for now, if you want to buy a premium SSD, there are better options available. Should Phison's new software fail to satisfy the hype, these products only become attractive at mainstream SSD prices.

MORE: Best SSDs For The Money
MORE: Latest Storage News
MORE: Storage in the Forums

Chris Ramseyer is a Contributing Editor for Tom's Hardware, covering Storage. Follow him on Twitter and on Facebook.

Follow Tom's Hardware on Twitter, Facebook and Google+.

Chris Ramseyer
Chris Ramseyer is a Contributing Editor for Tom's Hardware US. He tests and reviews consumer storage.
  • wtfxxxgp
  • mapesdhs
    Is there really anyone who would buy one of these over an EVO or Pro? I don't get Kingston's MO at all...
  • AndrewJacksonZA
    Right in your article there's a link to Amazon that has the Kingston HyperX Savage 240GB for USD110. There's also a link to the SanDisk Ultra II 240GB on Amazon for USD85.

    I do realize that you can't track all the pricing changes and that you base your reviews on the MSRP, I just thought that I'd point out in the comments that your "Price" con could perhaps no longer be justified.

    Thanks for the review Chris. :-)
  • AndrewJacksonZA
    Is there really anyone who would buy one of these over an EVO or Pro? I don't get Kingston's MO at all...
    In my current situation I'd go for a drive that gives me good value for money, which in my country, last time I checked, is a SanDisk or a Crucial, not the Samsung. However, your point is quite valid. Let's wait for the firmware upgrade, perhaps Chris might be willing to revisit this review.
  • CRamseyer
    The issue with pricing right now is the reviews are taking a little longer than I expected to come out. This was finished a month ago.

    In the next 30 days or so Phison should have the "10K" update finished. When that comes out this product could be competitive with 850 Pro and 850 EVO in 4K random performance. That is what they tell us anyway but we've been waiting on the 10K update for quite a while now.
  • rohitbaran
    This price better be an introductory price, considering that you can get a Samsung 850 EVO 500 GB SSD for $170 if you look around and that drive is unbeatable for the price as of now.
  • teknobug
    I have a Kingston HyperX 3K, it's a pretty fast drive but once I got a Samsung 850 EVO I was blown away at the difference and the Samsung is just a much better performer. I also have a Kingston SSDNow V300 and let's just say we should all forget that series ever exists, mine is the original kind before Kingston made them 50% slower but still they're not very good performing SSD's, my first gen Intel SSD (X-25) still performs better than the SSDNow V300 does.
  • Larry Litmanen
    If SSDs die after 3-4 years what is their future in consumer grade PCs. Regular people who have zero interest in tech will not be able to replace an SSD and boot OS on it.

  • Glock24
    After the V300 scam, I don't trust Kingston any more. It's a shame, I used to like their products.
  • Yoshihiro Shimokawa
    So wait, the 960GB model has 1024GB available to the user? That's a typo right?