Phenom II X2 555 Vs. Pentium G6950: New Budget Dual-Core Titans
Clash Of The $100 Dual-Core Titans
On one hand, we have AMD's newest and fastest dual-core processor, the Phenom II X2 555. Armed with the architecture's full 6MB of L3 cache and a 3.2 GHz clock rate, this top-of-the-line dual-core CPU is even multiplier-unlocked, as indicated by its Black Edition designator. This means that overclocking the 555 is as easy as upping the multiplier in the BIOS, or by using AMD's Overdrive tool. No need to sweat the details; the Phenom II X2 555 can provide a notable increase in speed with some simple and quick experimentation.
The value-oriented Pentium G6950 is a stark contrast indeed. Intel has gone out of its way to avoid highlighting this new CPU, deliberately leaving it out of the launch documentation sent to press and "relegating" it to the Pentium family. It is the only Clarkdale-based processor that doesn't sport Hyper-Threading. It's clocked at a fairly conservative 2.8 GHz, and the CPU doesn't support Turbo Boost, like the Core i3s. It only has 3 MB of cache, too (1MB less than the Core i3 CPUs and half that of the Phenom II X2 555).
After reading those two comparisons, you're probably wondering why these CPUs are even mentioned on the same page. Well, they have two important things in common. First, they both cost about $100. And second, they both represent the newest dual-core models available from Intel and AMD.
Header Cell - Column 0 | Phenom II X2 555 | Pentium G6950 |
---|---|---|
Codename: | Callisto | Clarkdale |
Process: | 45nm | 32nm |
CPU Cores: | 2 | 2 |
Clock Speed: | 3.2 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
Socket: | AM2+/AM3 | LGA 1156 |
L1 Cache: | 2 x 128KB | 2 x 64KB |
L2 Cache: | 2 x 512KB | 2 x 256KB |
L3 Cache: | 6MB | 3MB |
Thermal Envelope: | 80W | 73W |
In fact, the Pentium G6950 is not necessarily the underdog you might have interpreted it to be. Based on the new Clarkdale architecture, it might demonstrate a clock-for-clock advantage over the older Phenom II. This also means that the G6950 enjoys the benefit of 32nm manufacturing, compared to the Phenom II's older 45nm technology. Consequently, we're expecting positive things from Intel with regard to overclocking.
Our original plan was to benchmark the Phenom II X2 555 and Pentium G6950 at stock and overclocked speeds in order to see how far we can push them, and to see how close we could get to a more expensive option: the Core i5-750. Yes, that was our plan. Of course, life is what happens while you're making other plans...
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Current page: Clash Of The $100 Dual-Core Titans
Prev Page The New AMD CPUs: Speed Bumps For Free Next Page How Not To Overclock A Clarkdale-
obarthelemy I see a bunch of overclocking articles... do you have any clue about how many of your readers overclock ? and how many of the public at large ?Reply
My guess from personal anecdote would be 10% and 0.01 % resp ? -
burnley14 obarthelemyI see a bunch of overclocking articles... do you have any clue about how many of your readers overclock ? and how many of the public at large ?My guess from personal anecdote would be 10% and 0.01 % resp ?It's pretty much a free way to get better performance, so I'm glad they have so many articles about it.Reply -
volks1470 I'd say a decent majority do overclock, and this site isn't exactly for the general public. Not very people get what's going on here on Tom's.Reply
POLL!! -
blackjellognomes obarthelemyI see a bunch of overclocking articles... do you have any clue about how many of your readers overclock ? and how many of the public at large ?My guess from personal anecdote would be 10% and 0.01 % resp ?Reply
More like 50% and 5%, I think. -
melangex3 If you read this article, you are probably in a higher percentage group than the general public!Reply