Plextor S2C SSD Review

Early Verdict

The new Plextor S2 Series improves on the entry-level M series products, but it still lacks the polish required to standout in a crowded area filled with similar products. Plextor will need to shine this one up with superior pricing to make it attractive. Users should keep the advanced software package in mind when looking for a desktop replacement SSD, but we wouldn't pay a premium for it.

Reasons to buy

  • +

    Low cost

  • +

    Average entry-level performance

  • +

    Excellent software package

Reasons to avoid

  • -

    Average entry-level performance

  • -

    Lacks direct-to-die write technology

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

Specifications And Features

Plextor introduced a new series of SSDs just in time to start the new year. The S2 series replaced the M7V as the entry-level option and dawns a new era for the company. Plextor normally pairs Marvell controllers with Toshiba NAND, but the company tried a different approach this round. This is the kind of product we normally don't like, but the S2C delivers with an entry-level price and mainstream performance.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Chris Ramseyer
Contributor

Chris Ramseyer was a senior contributing editor for Tom's Hardware. He tested and reviewed consumer storage.

  • skoalreaver
    So average entry level performance is a Pro and a Con. WTF toms?
    Reply
  • wtfiwin
    @skoalreaver relax probably just meant what it says.

    can't wait to see some QLC or 3D-QLC for mass storage 20TB SSDs.
    Reply
  • Medric
    it is a pro cause its here but a con because this will start to be standerd; no more 8 channel so you know this could go alot faster than it is but i wont so it sucks
    Reply
  • chumly
    @Chris

    I never buy anything except for Samsung SSDs (unequaled performance numbers). However I run them in RAID. I was curious if RAID performance, especially in the real world application (game loads), would take less time or more time. I have never seen a comparison done in the kinds of tests you guys do with storage performance in tandem. I'm curious if it's worth the average person's time to run paired discs vs. unpaired.
    Reply
  • CRamseyer
    It is a pro and a con. As mentioned above, it is a good thing because we will get lower prices but a con because this type of performance is now the norm. It really all depends on when you jumped on the SSD train. I've been riding along since 2007 and saw performance rise, continue to rise for several years and then suddenly use "tricks" to achieve high levels of performance.

    If you only recently used SSDs then the least common denominator method is normal and acceptable.

    If your workload requires or uses heavy sequential reads and writes then RAID for performance (RAID 0) is a powerful tool with SATA SSDs. NVMe products are generally fast enough where RAID doesn't deliver the same performance increase. The bottleneck moves away from the storage device and to other areas like the file system.
    Reply
  • HERETIC-1
    Hi Chris,
    Nice review as always.Wouldn't surprise me if Plextor/Liteon wasn't the OEM
    for the Intel 540.
    One change I'd have made was-Drop the Crucial lemon from the charts,and
    added 750 EVO........................
    Reply
  • CRamseyer
    Pricing for the 750 EVO is so hit or miss these days in relation to the 850 EVO. If Samsung could keep it a good 20-25% less we would take it more serious. The difference in the 250GB capacity size right now on Amazon is less than $10. Unless you are digging through the couch to fund the purchase the easy pick between the two is the 850 EVO.
    Reply
  • daglesj
    32GB of ram to use the Turbo Feature? Someone didn't bother optimising their software.
    Reply
  • daglesj
    I'd be intrigued to find out how the old budget fave the Kingston V300 fares against these TLC parts.
    Reply
  • CRamseyer
    Which version of the V300? I don't know how many exist now but it's a handful of different controller and NAND configurations.

    I'm working on a page that will have tests from a bunch of SSDs in very long, organized, charts.
    Reply