Seagate FireCuda 530 M.2 NVMe SSD Review: Performance Above All (Updated)

Built to deliver high performance, endurance, and give users peace of mind.

Seagate FireCuda 530 4TB
Editor's Choice
(Image credit: © Tom's Hardware)

Tom's Hardware Verdict

Seagate’s 4TB FireCuda 530 is similar to the 2TB variant and dominates the Samsung 980 Pro and WD_Black SN850 in most of our tests, especially during sustained write workloads. As a result, Seagate’s FireCuda 530 takes the crown as the fastest M.2 SSD available.

Pros

  • +

    + Fast PCIe 4.0 performance

  • +

    + Impressive sustained write speeds and endurance

  • +

    + Attractive design & heatsink

  • +

    + 5-year warranty w/ 3-year rescue data recovery service

  • +

    + Cool operation

  • +

    + XTS-AES 256-bit encryption

Cons

  • -

    Expensive

  • -

    Less efficient than some competitors

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

September 7, 2021 Update: We've updated this article with new testing for the 4TB Seagate FireCuda 530 M.2 NVMe SSD on page 2. This drive has also been added to our list of Best SSDs for the PS5.

Original Review for the 2TB capacity was published on August 22, 2021:

Sean Webster
Storage Reviewer

Sean is a Contributing Editor at Tom’s Hardware US, covering storage hardware.

  • 2Be_or_Not2Be
    "Rather than operate the flash at 1,600 MTps as we had hoped for and expected, the 530’s flash operates at just 1,200 MTps "

    Well, built-in product segmentation already - 1,600 will go with the next Firecuda "540" model, or a 530 "Extreme" one later.
    Reply
  • FastrThnU
    "Very impressive sstained write speeds and endurance" Come on guys...be professional.
    Reply
  • Alvar "Miles" Udell
    Question: Why didn't you include the FireCuda 520 as well? TH reviewed the 1TB 520, but since this is the 2TB 530, it's not an apples to apples comparison. Plus the 520 is quite a bit less expensive at $380 vs the 520's $490 for 2TB.
    Reply
  • OMGPWNTIME
    Edit: Great article :)
    Reply
  • PapaCrazy
    More performance than Samsung Pro with twice the endurance and the same 5 year warranty?

    Adios Samsung.
    Reply
  • Sleepy_Hollowed
    PapaCrazy said:
    More performance than Samsung Pro with twice the endurance and the same 5 year warranty?

    Adios Samsung.

    No kidding, and the data recovery is icing on the cake. This is only possible on non encrypted data hence probably why the drive has no hardware encryption.

    For a gaming drive or a data crunching drive that doesn’t require encryption, this is the undisputed champion.
    Reply
  • samopa
    After two (out of eight) Seagate FireCuda 520 2TB fails less than 10 months, I had swear to myself not buy their product again. Yes they replace the broken SSDs because its under warranty, but the lost data on the SSDs are irreplaceable and cost me few contracts and projects, not counting the intangible losses.
    Reply
  • mdd1963
    "The FireCuda 530 is a premium device for built professionals..., "

    Can those who are in less than optimum shape use them too? :)
    Reply
  • saunupe1911
    test this in a PS5!
    Reply
  • hannibal
    saunupe1911 said:
    test this in a PS5!

    it has allready been tested on PS5.
    Reply