Nvidia to sell its advanced AI processors to Middle East countries amid tough US export rules

Nvidia
(Image credit: Nvidia)

When the U.S. introduced its latest export control rules for advanced AI and HPC processors, it not only restricted sales of sophisticated processors to Chinese entities, it also restricted supplies of these devices to multiple Middle East countries. However, a new report indicates that Nvidia believes it can get an export license to sell its AI GPUs to a telecom giant operating in multiple Middle East countries.

Nvidia has entered into a deal with Ooredoo to 'introduce its AI technology' in datacenters across five Middle Eastern countries, reports Reuters. This collaboration signifies Nvidia's first major expansion in a region where the U.S. has restricted exports of advanced AI and HPC processors to prevent Chinese access to cutting-edge technologies to train its large language AI models or even advance its military capabilities. 

Ooredoo, a telecom giant, will now offer Nvidia's AI and HPC GPUs in its datacenters located in Qatar, Algeria, Tunisia, Oman, Kuwait, and the Maldives. This development positions Ooredoo as the region's first company to offer such services to its clients, granting them a significant competitive edge in deploying generative AI applications. What is unclear is how Ooredoo will prevent Chinese entities from accessing these GPUs in the cloud.

Aziz Aluthman Fakhroo, Ooredoo's CEO, highlighted that this agreement will allow their business clients to access services that their competitors might not have for another 18 to 24 months. Unfortunately, it is unclear which GPUs Nvidia will supply to its partners in the Middle East and the value of the deal also remains undisclosed. While the U.S. allows the export of certain Nvidia technologies to the Middle East, it restricts the most advanced chips. Ooredoo did not specify which Nvidia GPUs will be deployed, indicating only that this will depend on availability and customer needs.

When it comes to power, Ooredoo is investing $1 billion to expand its regional datacenter capacity by 20-25 additional megawatts, adding to its current 40 megawatts, according to Reuters. The company aims to nearly triple its capacity by the end of the decade, reflecting its commitment to install substantial computing capacity. 

Ooredoo has separated its datacenters into an independent company.  The company also plans to spin off its undersea cables and fiber network into another separate entity. These moves are part of Ooredoo's strategy to optimize its operations and increase its market competitiveness.

Anton Shilov
Contributing Writer

Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.

  • A Stoner
    Wavers are put in place to ensure kickbacks into the right hands. Or at least that seems like the only rational reason they would exist. Otherwise they would be part of the initial rollout.
    Reply
  • zsydeepsky
    well, Nvidia doesn't have much choice here. many Middle Eastern nations have data center contracts with Huawei, so either Nvidia tries to bypass the sanction or let Huawei have all the market share, like what happened in mainland China.
    Reply
  • rluker5
    I think the intent of the sanctions are to let the second option occur. The data center components Huawei are selling probably wouldn't rise to the level of performance to be sanctioned.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    A Stoner said:
    Wavers are put in place to ensure kickbacks into the right hands. Or at least that seems like the only rational reason they would exist. Otherwise they would be part of the initial rollout.
    Waivers exist because blanket policies often have sensible exceptions. So, it makes sense to have a formal mechanism to allow them, so that it's not done in a corrupt, back room fashion.
    Reply
  • yahrightthere
    bit_user said:
    Waivers exist because blanket policies often have sensible exceptions. So, it makes sense to have a formal mechanism to allow them, so that it's not done in a corrupt, back room fashion.
    Correct, it's so it can be done in a corrupt front room fashion.
    Reply
  • alan.campbell99
    zsydeepsky said:
    well, Nvidia doesn't have much choice here. many Middle Eastern nations have data center contracts with Huawei, so either Nvidia tries to bypass the sanction or let Huawei have all the market share, like what happened in mainland China.
    I’d be curious how such contracts last when Huawei faces challenges advancing their tech.

    I also wonder how viable data centres are in the Middle East, wouldn’t the climate present challenges for cooling thus adding cost?
    Reply
  • jlake3
    alan.campbell99 said:
    I’d be curious how such contracts last when Huawei faces challenges advancing their tech.

    I also wonder how viable data centres are in the Middle East, wouldn’t the climate present challenges for cooling thus adding cost?
    The climate could make cooling more difficult, but my understanding is that energy costs are extremely low in the Gulf States, so it may be economical to simply throw power at the problem. Plus the wealthier middle eastern countries are throwing a bunch of money around on IoT smart cities additive manufacturing blockchain AI, and I imagine there are practical and political reasons to have data centers geographically close to your client even if isn't the ideal place for one.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    yahrightthere said:
    Correct, it's so it can be done in a corrupt front room fashion.
    "Sunlight is the best disinfectant."

    If it's public, that should minimize chances for corruption, since everyone can see if particular parties are seeming to get favored or if waivers are being granted that don't seem justifiable.

    Also, how about providing some evidence of corruption in the process? You guys don't get to just imagine crimes and then proceed to talk & behave as if they're a reality!
    Reply
  • Kondamin
    At least we know they can afford a fine if there were to be trouble
    Reply
  • yahrightthere
    bit_user said:
    "Sunlight is the best disinfectant."

    If it's public, that should minimize chances for corruption, since everyone can see if particular parties are seeming to get favored or if waivers are being granted that don't seem justifiable.

    Also, how about providing some evidence of corruption in the process? You guys don't get to just imagine crimes and then proceed to talk & behave as if they're a reality!
    Show evidence of innocence and you will find evidence of corruption, question is will it hold up in a court of law....NO WAY NO HOW...myself I tend to like dark matter more so than sunlight.
    Reply