AMD Ultrathins to Knockout Intel Ultrabooks on Price

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Jane McEntegart
Contributor

Jane McEntegart is a writer, editor, and marketing communications professional with 17 years of experience in the technology industry. She has written about a wide range of technology topics, including smartphones, tablets, and game consoles. Her articles have been published in Tom's Guide, Tom's Hardware, MobileSyrup, and Edge Up.

  • someguynamedmatt
    Now THIS I have faith in. Not that 'ultrabooks' hold that much market share, but I feel that AMD could pull this off quite nicely with their APU lineup and beat out Intel.
    Reply
  • megamanx00
    Promises promises. We'll see how they do once they are available. In the mean time Intel will be unopposed in that space.
    Reply
  • spookie
    Can't wait!! Go make us proud AMD, make affordable ultrathins and drive the price of ultrabooks down
    Reply
  • Borisblade7
    After having both mobile amd llano and mobile intel IB, ill take amd anyday in a system that wont have discrete graphics to make up for the god awful performance of intel in that area.
    Reply
  • AMD also claims that the 17w ULV Trinity chips for the ultra thins will be about as powerful as 35W LLano mobile chips today. That performance level at $200 less then an Ivy Bridge laptop does not seem like a great deal to me unless IVB simply can't play games, but it can, although not as well.

    Also if you are looking for a gaming machine then a $500 35w Trinity machine makes a hell of a lot more sense then a $600-800 17w Trinity ultrathin anyway. Or a $800 IVB setup with a dedicated gpu.

    As long as its significantly cheaper I think AMD will sell a decent amount of ultra thins to the Best Buy type shopper who favors price>form>brand>performance. Yet I dont think they would be a good choice from a performance>form>price>brand perspective.
    Reply
  • g4114rd0
    +1  pushing a low-price strategy.

    recommended and useful, AMD should try to do something very similar on BD.
    Reply
  • kawininjazx
    AMD can't beat intel at anything, only on processors under $100 maybe.
    Reply
  • SteelCity1981
    Competition means everything. Thank you AMD without you Intel cpu's would avg over 400 dollars. right now.
    Reply
  • bigdragon
    At Intel's Ultrabook price point I expect discrete graphics. Intel's graphics performance is abysmal, and I do not see that changing with Ivy Bridge given how they fudged that CES demo. I have been very surprised by AMD's APU products. They could actually put this off. Their price point, graphics performance, and spec flexibility is much more appealing.

    AMD drove themselves into the ditch with Bulldozer. I hope they give Intel a run for their money with Trinity.
    Reply
  • A Bad Day
    Intel's Plan B:

    Publicity smear, hyping on the importance of processing power and bashing Trinity's weaker CPU power, while completely ignoring graphics performance.
    Reply