Sony Replacing Tape With Optical Disc Archive System

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Kevin Parrish
Contributor

Kevin Parrish has over a decade of experience as a writer, editor, and product tester. His work focused on computer hardware, networking equipment, smartphones, tablets, gaming consoles, and other internet-connected devices. His work has appeared in Tom's Hardware, Tom's Guide, Maximum PC, Digital Trends, Android Authority, How-To Geek, Lifewire, and others.

  • zak_mckraken
    If they can ensure reliability equal or great than tape drives (which should be quite easy), they have a winner here.
    Reply
  • razorblaze42
    8 tracks are coming back? Nice
    Reply
  • freggo
    Prob. out of the price range of the average consumer for some time it sounds like a very interesting backup alternative.

    Are the cartridges the write once type; like a stack of Blue ray discs for instance... or can data be erased as well ?
    Reply
  • WyomingKnott
    Twelve platters in a removable cartridge? Sounds like a great step - backwards.
    Reply
  • RogueKitsune
    The only way i could see this type of system replacing current tape archiving is if it does live up to its claims of being more durable, and faster at reads/writes. Correct me if i am wrong but current tape back-ups can store almost 3 times as much data as one of the "disc cartridges". Which would mean companies would have to double or even possibly triple the amount of back-up media they keep track of. All of that sounds like spending lots of money to me.

    But on the other hand if this new media doesn't need to be re-backed-up nearly as often it might pay for itself in the long run.
    Reply
  • syrious1
    maybe the way the data is stored on the tape makes it less vulnerable during restores?
    Reply
  • How much data can a company possibly still be holding onto on tape drives?
    Redundancy for small storage space can be done through multiple media now. This is a niche product (its on the level of using duck tape to wrap 6 optical discs together and toss into an enclosure that will use them in a "raid"), why not just use single large capacity disk to archive data that my company has around on tape drives still? Storage size to relative cost will be better, physical storage will be less, but efficiency would be lower using single disks.
    Reply
  • kawininjazx
    freggoProb. out of the price range of the average consumer for some time it sounds like a very interesting backup alternative.Are the cartridges the write once type; like a stack of Blue ray discs for instance... or can data be erased as well ?
    This is for enterprise and larger businesses I imagine, I don't think home users are a concern.
    Reply
  • drwho1
    let's see... 300GB = 12Bluray single layer disks (12 X 25GB = 300GB)
    Double layer = 600GB
    Triple layer = 900GB
    and the Quad layers 1.2TB

    It will probably be a lot cheaper to just buy the individual disks.

    Probably a lot faster too.
    Reply
  • __-_-_-__
    imo optical storage is never good. specially for storage archiving. I bet a HDD array is cheaper then this system.
    Reply