Skylake Xeon Platforms Spotted, Purley Makes A Quiet Splash At Computex

Intel's forthcoming 14nm Skylake Xeons are still in development, but a motherboard vendor here at Computex 2016 already had several Purley platforms (which will house the new chips) on display in its suite. Intel has not publicly shared any information on the new platform, but the boards indicate that the company has working silicon and is on the downward side of development.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Paul Alcorn
Editor-in-Chief

Paul Alcorn is the Editor-in-Chief for Tom's Hardware US. He also writes news and reviews on CPUs, storage, and enterprise hardware.

  • TechyInAZ
    Wow, those sockets are colossal. I've never seen a socket that big in my life.
    Reply
  • therealduckofdeath
    Wow, those sockets are colossal. I've never seen a socket that big in my life.
    Yeah that looks yuuuge! I guess that's the price to pay for maximizing memory bandwidth. A lot of memory lanes means a lot of pins. :D
    Reply
  • gangrel
    Can't be for just memory, not THAT many. 64, maybe 128, OK, but this is crazy many pins. It's 500 more pins than you would need to do some weird socket 2011 + socket 1151 configuration.

    I wonder if the pins are mostly to support interconnections between sections of the FPGA...for parallel processing support, for example...and/or with the rest of the processor
    Reply
  • therealduckofdeath
    It's got a quad channel memory controller, (rumour has it that future processors might have 6 memory channels; that's 384 pins just for the data), add a few for address and other selector bits. Add a 40 lane PCI bus. That requires a lot of pins. The motherboard interconnects wouldn't plug straight into the processor.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    18065537 said:
    It's got a quad channel memory controller, (rumour has it that future processors might have 6 memory channels;
    This is the future platform with 6-channel memory. Maybe the first board shown only supports 4, but the board in the second & third pics has 6 DIMMs on each side of both CPUs.

    It's tempting to speculate about the black DIMM slots, in the first pic - that they might be only for NVDIMMS, or something. In that case, I don't know why they'd be closest to the CPU, though. Maybe they just go in normal DIMM slots, and this is why Intel went to 6-channel.

    Anyway, don't forget about OmniPath. Surely, they'll need some pins for that!
    Reply
  • bit_user
    The incredible size of the processors begs the TDP question
    This is mis-formulated. Begging the question is where the answer to the question is included in its phrasing. And even though a large socket suggests a high TDP, I wouldn't say it begs the question.
    Reply
  • gangrel
    Well, ok...but expanding from 256 to 384 pins for memory access, only adds 128 pins, and that's not even related to the FPGA functionality, really. You'll do this any time you push to 6 memory slots. Going to 12 slots might blow things up to 768 for data; not sure how many for control. This slot has *1600* more pins. :)
    Reply
  • bit_user
    The real news is that Intel is embracing FPGAs to counter the death of Moore's law.
    It might have more to do with customers like Google wanting to accelerate things like machine learning in hardware. Perhaps it's a hedge against Xeon Phi's successor (Knight's Landing) failing to compete with GPUs. Or maybe OEMs just demanded it, as a way to further differentiate their product offerings.

    I think it'd be interesting to know whether Xeon D basically freed them from having to worry about the single-CPU use case. So, they could basically focus Purely on scalability.
    Reply
  • CarbonK
    That's a lot of pins.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    18065784 said:
    that's not even related to the FPGA functionality, really. You'll do this any time you push to 6 memory slots. Going to 12 slots might blow things up to 768 for data
    I'm puzzled by what pins people think would be added for FPGA. Why wouldn't it just sit on PCIe or the internal bus connecting the cores?

    And the slides we've seen indicate this is only 6-channel - not 12. There can be multiple DIMMs per channel, which is especially common in servers (which use registered memory, with its lower electrical load, specifically for this purpose).
    Reply