Netgear Responds to Critical Vulnerabilities With Beta Router Firmware Updates (Updated)

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Nathaniel Mott
Freelance News & Features Writer

Nathaniel Mott is a freelance news and features writer for Tom's Hardware US, covering breaking news, security, and the silliest aspects of the tech industry.

  • dgingeri
    This is something that should have come back in September, considering the vulnerability was known to them back in August.
    Reply
  • sykozis
    Did you even read the article? They had no record of a prior report before Dec 9, so it was not known to them back in August. It's been known to them since Dec 9 when CERT notified them.
    Reply
  • jkhoward
    @Sykozis - Do you honestly think it fell through the cracks.. don't be a fool.
    Reply
  • NinjaNerd56
    FYI, you have to go after this manually. The firmware updates in the device UI can't "see" the beta .18 release.

    Download from Netgear and browse for the file, otherwise it's no joy in Mudville.
    Reply
  • dgingeri
    19003963 said:
    Did you even read the article? They had no record of a prior report before Dec 9, so it was not known to them back in August. It's been known to them since Dec 9 when CERT notified them.

    Once it had been disclosed that the first notification occurred in August, we conducted a search and confirmed this was the case. Admittedly, this was an oversight on our part.

    Yes, they knew about it in August. They disregarded it because their internal processes regarding being informed of such things failed to include or specifically excluded outside sources of such information. In other words: they don't consider communication with their customers as a priority.

    This has to do with management style. It is "old school" to only consider internal sources of information for such things unless forced. This was the way management was taught until the last 10 years or so. I know this because I have fought with it for most of my career. Many companies are still stuck in this mentality, even in the tech industry. Cisco, Oracle, Creative Labs, VMWare, and EA are particularly bad about it. Companies like this head off in their own direction, regardless of what their customers want, and then suddenly realize they have become irrelevant.

    More pioneering companies have begun to realize that this mentality is what causes big companies to fail to stay up in their markets. They began to take heed of what their customers had to say, and even began to solicit feedback from their customers. Microsoft started it with their constant focus groups, but have lagged behind lately, particularly during Steve Balmer's time as CEO. Bill Gates had the wisdom to work with people and find out what they wanted and how they worked to create an interface that people could use easily. (Thankfully, their new CEO has headed back in this direction.) Since then, others have started this, like Blizzard, which started a very active forum system to listen to their players' feedback.

    Netgear has always been a rather isolationist company. They have very little in the way of active support, let alone user feedback. Ever try to get tech support for a bad router? It takes weeks to get a replacement. Do you think they even have any way to submit feedback on bugs? That is why they failed at this. They aren't paying attention, to their customers, the direction of the market, or the quality of their products, and they are going to pay for it in the end.
    Reply
  • sam1275tom
    I gave my Netgear away and never buy that brand again since they refuse to fix the critical(and simple) bug on my jnr3210, now I'm looking at this and laughing, good work Netgear, screw all your customers continuously, you know they are all foolish and will buy your product again!
    Reply
  • hoofhearted
    You would think they would staff someone with a rudimentary knowledge of all thing security related who keeps up. Anyway to test:

    http:///cgi-bin/;ps$IFS
    Reply
  • hoofhearted
    Opinions?

    Netgear-updated-firmware
    tomato
    openwrt
    ddwrt

    I have read that you take a performance hit with ddwrt as it doesn't leverage some of the proprietary network driver stuff as the stock fw does.
    Reply
  • hoofhearted
    Also, if you run the above ps command and see telnetd in there, you may have already been hacked.
    Reply
  • dgingeri
    pfsense seems to be about the best way to go for a router, unless you want to get into enterprise level firewalls.
    Reply