Silicon Motion SM2258 Technical Preview With Micron 3D TLC NAND

Early Verdict

Silicon Motion is on pace to take over the entry-level and mainstream markets again. Very few companies are this far along in controller development for 3D flash, but the SM2258 is nearly ready in the form we tested today. We suspect it will lead the market and increase the number of design wins for the company in late 2016 and early 2017.

Pros

  • +

    Low cost 4-channel design

  • +

    Excellent reliability

  • +

    Solid performance for the number of NAND die

Cons

  • -

    Not 100% optimized at this time

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

Specifications And Features

The Silicon Motion SM2258 controller is already shipping with 2D NAND in Intel's 540s (consumer) and 5400s (professional) SSDs. Intel leveraged the SM2258's powerful low-density parity check for one last gasp with 2D NAND, but we expect to see the SM2258 ship in several new products as IMFT 3D flash becomes widely available.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Chris Ramseyer
Contributor

Chris Ramseyer was a senior contributing editor for Tom's Hardware. He tested and reviewed consumer storage.

  • illuminatuz
    Low endurance 3-bit per cell?!? That is 32 bit right?!
    Reply
  • Badelhas
    What does this mean, in reallity? It will outperform the high-end samsung 850 pro drives?
    Reply
  • stairmand
    It's pretty cool, but I really don't see the point. S-ATA SSDs are a dead end, the future belongs to M.2 and U.2.
    Reply
  • 18409763 said:
    Low endurance 3-bit per cell?!? That is 32 bit right?!

    tlc have 3-bit cells. there are 8 levels of states (not sure if these are volts or amps), each level give a binary number between 000 and 111, so can represent 3 independent bits. To have 2 independent bits, you only need to reliably distinguish 4 states, which is obviously easier, but the 66% less memory per density.
    Reply