Report: Details On Intel's Haswell Server CPUs Emerge

While the rumor mill has been working hard regarding Intel's upcoming Haswell chips for the consumer market, it has been awfully quiet about the server market. All of a sudden, though, a great deal of information has appeared.

The Xeon 1200 V3 is the most logical successor to the Xeon 1200 V2. The 1200 V2 was based on the Ivy Bridge platform. Rumors indicate that the Xeon 1200 V3 chips will be part of the Denlow server platform, meaning they'll be based on the same LGA 1150 socket as the consumer desktop Haswell chips.

The Xeon 1200 V3 chips will carry either no onboard graphics, the GT1 chip or the GT2 chip. The GT2 chip that some of the Xeon 1200 V3 chips will carry is reportedly just as powerful as the Intel HD Graphics 4600 that we'll see on the consumer Haswell chips. The units with an integrated graphics chip will have the model name ending in a 5, rather than a 0, for those that don't carry integrated graphics.

Chips whose model names end with an L are low TDP chips, the lowest of which has a TDP of just 16 W.

ModelCores / ThreadsFreqMax. Turbo (All / Single)L3 CacheGPUTDP
E3-1285 V34 / 83.6 GHz3.8 GHz / 4.0 GHz8 MBGT284 W
E3-1285L V34 / 83.1 GHz3.5 GHz / 3.9 GHz8 MBGT265 W
E3-1280 V34 / 83.6 GHz3.8 GHz / 4.0 GHz8 MB-82 W
E3-1275 V34 / 83.5 GHz3.7 GHz / 3.9 GHz8 MBGT284 W
E3-1270 V34 / 83.5 GHz3.7* GHz / 3.9* GHz8 MB-80 W
E3-1265L V34 / 82.5 GHz3.1 GHz / 3.7 GHz8 MBGT145 W
E3-1245 V34 / 83.4 GHz3.6 GHz / 3.8 GHz8 MBGT284 W
E3-1240 V34 / 83.4 GHz3.6 GHz / 3.8 GHz8 MB-80 W
E3-1230 V34 / 83.3 GHz3.5 GHz / 3.7 GHz8 MB-80 W
E3-1230L V32 / 41.8 GHz2.3 GHz / 2.8 GHz8 MB-25 W
E3-1225 V34 / 43.2 GHz3.4 GHz / 3.6 GHz8 MBGT284 W
E3-1220 V34 / 43.1 GHz3.3 GHz / 3.5 GHz8 MB-80 W
E3-1220L V32 / 41.6 GHz1.9 GHz / 2.3 GHz4 MB-16 W

* Due to a lack of clarity in the document, this is an assumed number.

Sadly, the document has been taken offline from Intel's website.

We can expect the Xeon 1200 V3 CPUs to appear between May 27 and June 7, 2013, possibly at Computex.

Contact Us for News Tips, Corrections and Feedback

Create a new thread in the US News comments forum about this subject
This thread is closed for comments
13 comments
    Your comment
    Top Comments
  • blazorthon
    thecolorbluestill at 4 cores = pathetic Intel, really pathetic


    What is with you people? You're all being just stupid. Intel already has CPUs with more than four cores. They'd need much larger CPUs and sockets if they were going to put in six or more cores and that'd be stupid because, again, this stuff is just the lower end Xeons. Mid-ranged Xeons will be up to six or eight cores, maybe ten for Haswell. High-end Xeons will probably be at fifteen to twenty cores. Stop trolling.
    12
  • Other Comments
  • meowmix44
    Excellent prouct line:)
    0
  • MrKKBB
    Need to move up to 6 cores!
    3
  • blazorthon
    ankit0x1atleast 16 core is needed

    MrKKBBNeed to move up to 6 cores!


    This is just the lower mid-ranged for single socket servers and workstations not based on consumer i7s. They don't need six cores. That's what the X58/X79 sort of stuff is for. Wait for their Haswell successor, assuming that it's coming next instead of an Ivy successor.
    5