Download the Tom's Hardware App from the App Store
The reference for current tech news
Yes No
Ads

Kingston Launches HyperX External USB 3.0 SSDs

by - source: Tom's Hardware US

This SSD goes to SuperSpeed.

If you're packing a USB 3.0 PC, then you likely have the need for speed. SSDs are clearly on our list of things that make our computers go faster, but those are already sitting happily in our internal SATA interfaces.

Kingston has a solution for those wanting to make their USB 3.0 fly, and that is with the just-made-official HyperX MAX external SSD. We first laid eyes on this product in its early stages back in June of this year during our tour of the Kingston factory, but now the product is finished and ready to ship in December.

The HyperX MAX 3.0 has a read speed of up to 195MB/sec., and a write speed of up to 160MB/sec., when paired with a USB 3.0 compatible device. It is also fully compatible with USB 2.0 devices, but the speed defaults back to USB 2.0 capability.

During Kingston's internal testing, a 10GB movie file was transferred in 1 minute, 12 seconds to the HyperX MAX 3.0 from a USB 3.0 system. On a USB 2.0 port on the same system, however, the transfer time increased to 5 minutes, 52 seconds.

HyperX MAX 3.0 is available in 64GB, 128GB and 256GB capacities at $222, $365, and $743, respectively.

Share:
24
Comments
X
Submit

Comments
Add your comment
amk09 11/26/2010 2:17 AM
Hide
-2+

why so expensive :(

Anonymous 11/26/2010 2:30 AM
Hide
-10+

Quote :why so expensive
Why so serious?

apache_lives 11/26/2010 2:54 AM
Hide
-8+

hyper(e)X(pensive) is true, for a device you can just loose or drop, not at that price no thankyou

kscr7 11/26/2010 3:24 AM
Hide
-0+

omg

Ragnar-Kon 11/26/2010 4:04 AM
Hide
-1+

$600 for the top end model I can see. I can even see sort-of-kind-of see $650 since it is one of the first USB 3.0 SSD external-only drives, and you gotta add on the Kingston HyperX tax anyway. But $743? Really?

I think I'll just stick with my old-fashion spinning hard disks for now.

dEAne 11/26/2010 4:30 AM
Hide
-0+

not bad but expensive though

beans4you 11/26/2010 4:31 AM
Hide
-0+

SICK! lets take advantage of this 3.0 already!

amstech 11/26/2010 4:43 AM
Show
lotri 11/26/2010 5:14 AM
Hide
--1+

They're also brand-new. Price will drop over time, of course.

rohitbaran 11/26/2010 5:45 AM
Hide
-7+

lotri :
They're also brand-new. Price will drop over time, of course.


As if it has dropped on other SSDs.

maximus20895 11/26/2010 6:14 AM
Hide
-2+

Recently, I read that in 2007 a 128GB SSD was around $4,500...

JOSHSKORN 11/26/2010 7:05 AM
Hide
-1+

Offer that same product with 8 times the capacity of the 256 (2TB) at $350 and you have yourselves a new customer. I guess I'll be waiting until 2013 for one of these. Maybe they'll have a USB 4.0 by then...just maybe. I haven't checked the roadmap, yet.

alyoshka 11/26/2010 9:41 AM
Hide
-0+

Nice.... will wait for the prices to drop...... if it can be stripped and used as a sataII or sata III why not.....

Fancarolina 11/26/2010 9:41 AM
Hide
-0+

Why would someone buy this you could buy an external enclosure, a separate SSD that's faster and connect over ESATA? It would be faster cheaper and everyone already has SATA on their systems.

kikireeki 11/26/2010 11:47 AM
Hide
-0+

SSD as a portable drive! such a waste!

psaus 11/26/2010 12:44 PM
Hide
-0+

Normally I like Kingston's releases... this however is a complete pile and waste of money.
In a very short time devices will be this fast, and the size of a normal USB stick... oh and regularly priced. Not extortionate.
I'll spend my money on an internal SSD

Oh, @amstech, would agree 100% if this wasn't on a USB interface. Apps won't install to this SSD.

nebun 11/26/2010 4:33 PM
Hide
-0+

slow

drwho1 11/26/2010 6:27 PM
Hide
-0+

so for the price of 7 2TB and 1 1TB hard drive = 15TB you could have 256GB
WoW! what a bargain! (sarcasm 101)

noblerabbit 11/26/2010 7:12 PM
Hide
-0+

Our Money is best spent on a NAS from Synology or QNAP,

or just get a USB 3.0 Docking Station, with some speedy 2.5' 7200 RPM drives, and have some left over for an upgrade to Intel Sandy Bridge next quarter.

Come to think of it, I was excited for USB 3.0 last year, but I realize, USB is more about convenience, and not so much for raw speed.

Sorry Kingston, you are Genuine and all, but this is an overpriced gadget, just like your 64GB USB sticks.

Anonymous 11/26/2010 11:44 PM
Hide
-0+

Let´s wait. SSD is not harder to make than simple
electronics for ovens or micro-ovens even.

This is only marketing, they are trying to find out
how much money they can get from this product that
they found out we would like.

I would like to see SSD priced 25% over HD-disks not
more and SSD would return quickly for producers.

anonymous_user 11/26/2010 11:48 PM
Hide
-0+

For some reason I read it as: This SSD goes to Ludicrous Speed.

curiousgeorgieo 11/27/2010 12:35 PM
Hide
-0+

When you look at a USB 2.0 read and write review I was wouldn't you expect the 3.0's to be significantly faster?

http://www.anandtech.com/show/2808/4

universalremonster 11/28/2010 3:38 PM
Hide
-0+

That's rediculous when you consider this

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6820139423

plus this

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] _-17121079

equals a faster drive for over $200.00 cheaper...and the SSD itself is the same brand... I guess Kingston just believes we are all stupid.

processthis 11/28/2010 4:44 PM
Hide
-0+

Prices on SSDs need to come down.

Ads

Best offers

Newsletters


OK
Ads